Laserfiche WebLink
<br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City <br />council of the City of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota was duly <br />held on the 13th day of June, 1988, at 7:30 p.m. <br /> <br />The following members were present: Cushman, Johnson, Matson, Kehr, <br />and Rog, and the following were absent: None. <br /> <br />Member Matson introduced the following resolution and moved its <br />adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 8304 <br /> <br />ALTERNATIVE SITES FOR LIBRARY EXPANSION <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Ramsey County Board of Commissioners gave preliminary <br />approval to a modified Library Facilities Plan December 7, 1987; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, said plan designated Roseville for a major resource library at <br />approximately twice its present size, with the provision that the <br />expansion of the present site be limited only to the north; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Roseville was requested to assist the County with its site <br />planning activities; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Roseville was asked to potentially assist the County with <br />financial assistance relating to site acquisition; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, limiting the site strictly to the north severely limits <br />Roseville's ability to properly participate in site planning and <br />financial assistance; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, limiting expansion to the north severely limits the County's <br />and City's ability to negotiate with different landowners; <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Roseville respect- <br />fully requests that the conditions limiting the present site expansion <br />to the north be modified to permit consideration of land acquisition <br />to the west or east of the existing site. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly <br />seconded by Member Johnson, and upon a vote being taken thereon, the <br />following voted in favor thereof: Cushman, Johnson, Matson, Kehr, and <br />Rog, and the following voted against the same: None. <br /> <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />