Laserfiche WebLink
<br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING <br />OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE <br />CITY OF ROSEVILLE, <br />RAMSEY COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Roseville, <br />County of Ramsey, State of Milmesota, was duly held in the City Hall at 2660 Civic Center Drive, <br />Roseville, Minnesota, on April 24, 2006 <br /> <br />The following members were present: Ihlan, Klausing Kough, Maschka and Pust. <br />and the following members were absent: None. <br /> <br />Meluber Maschka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION 10402 <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO SUBMIT AN <br />APPLICATION FOR THE RAMSEY COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE FUND FOR <br />TWIN LAKES PROJECT, PHASE 1, STAGE 1 <br /> <br />BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Roseville act as the legal sponsor for project(s) contained in the <br />Contamination Cleanup Grant Program to be submitted on May 1, 2006 and that the Mayor and City <br />Manager are hereby authorized to apply to the Ramsey County Environmental Response Funds for this <br />project on behalf of the City of Roseville for the Twin Lakes Project, Phase I, Stage 1. <br /> <br />BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Roseville has the legal authority to apply for <br />financial assistance, and the institutional, managerial, and financial capability to ensure adequate proj ect <br />administration. <br /> <br />BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon approval of its application by Ramsey County, the City <br />of Roseville may enter into an agreement with Ramsey County for the above-referenced project(s), and <br />that the City of Roseville certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulation as stated in <br />all contract agreements. <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized <br />to execute such agreements as are necessary to implement the project(s) on behalf of the applicant. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Pust, and upon vote taken <br />thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Kough, Maschka, Pust and Klausing. <br /> <br />the following voted against the same: None. <br /> <br />the following abstained: Ihlan. <br />