My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-10-05_PR Comm Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010
>
2010-10-05_PR Comm Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2014 9:40:25 AM
Creation date
7/18/2014 9:40:25 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION <br />MINUTES OF MEETING OF OCTOBER 5, 2010 <br />ROSEVILLE CITY HALL ~ 6:30PM <br /> <br />PRESENT: <br /> Azer, Doneen, Etten, D. Holt, M. Holt, Jacobson, Pederson, Ristow, Stark <br />ABSENT: <br /> Willmus (notified staff prior to meeting) <br />STAFF: <br /> Brokke, Anfang <br /> <br /> INTRODUCTIONS/ROLL CALL/PUBLIC COMMENT <br />1. <br />No public comment <br /> <br /> APPROVAL OF MINUTES – AUGUST 3, 2010 MEETING <br />2. <br />Commission Recommendation: <br /> <br />. <br />Minutes for the August 3, 2010 meeting were approved unanimously <br /> <br /> APPROVAL OF MINUTES – SEPTEMBER 18, 2010 MEETING <br />3. <br />Commission Recommendation: <br /> <br />. <br />Minutes for the September 18, 2010 meeting were approved unanimously <br /> <br /> NOVEMBER MEETING DATE CHANGE DUE to ELECTION <br />4. <br />Commissioners agreed on Tuesday, November 9, 2010 as the alternative November meeting date. Because <br />of the need to change from the regular meeting date, the November Commission Meeting will need to take <br />place away from the Council Chambers as this location is committed to another meeting. <br /> <br /> MASTER PLAN IMPLEMENTATION DISCUSSION <br />5. <br />Brokke and Anfang discussed ideas for the next stage of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, the <br />Implementation. Much of the discussion was a follow-up to the initial implementation dialogue at the <br />September Commission Retreat. <br /> <br />Commissioners discussed the timing of a statistically valid survey, is it best early in the implementation <br />o <br />process or better later in the process. <br /> <br />Commissioners recommended a smaller steering team (smaller than the CAT membership), possibly 8- <br />o <br />10 citizens. <br /> <br />Commissioners suggested the implementation process involve looking into ways to raise funding outside <br />o <br />of a referendum. <br /> <br />Commissioners outlined the need to understand, from the community, how to fund the master plan <br />o <br />projects, at what level are the projects funded and what projects are funded when. <br /> <br />Commission agreed that the Implementation Steering Team’s first task would be to develop a work plan <br />o <br />and then begin talking to the community about the plan. <br /> <br />Commissioners recommended staff follow-up with Michael Schroeder to get his thoughts on the <br />o <br />implementation process. <br /> <br /> EMERALD ASH BORER <br />6. <br />Brokke presented the City of Roseville Emerald Ash Borer Management Plan. Brokke talked about how the <br />plan will be reviewed and updated regularly. <br /> <br />The Management Plan includes 9 components: <br /> <br />1.Inventory to determine what is out in the community <br /> <br />2.Identify Management Options <br /> <br />3.Ordinance Update <br /> <br />4.Wood Hauling Requirements <br /> <br />5.Planting Strategies <br /> <br />6.Outreach and Education <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.