Laserfiche WebLink
<br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OFTHE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City <br />of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly held at the City Hall on Monday, the <br />27th day of July, 1998, at 6:30 P.M. <br /> <br />The following members were present: <br />and the following were absent: <br /> <br />Council Member <br /> <br />introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> <br />GRANTING A VARIANCE <br />TO ALLOW A SECOND ACCESSORY BUILDING <br />AND INCREASE THE LOT COVERAGE TO 76.5% <br />OF THE REQUIRED REAR YARD <br />AT 2042-2044 DALE STREET NORTH <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Section 1004.01 (A) of the Roseville City Code allows one accessory <br />building not exceeding an area equal to 25% of the required rear yard for residential <br />properties; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Mike Heffernan has requested a variance to allow the construction of <br />a second accessory building and a variance to increase the lot coverage to 76.5% of the <br />required rear yard for the purpose of constructing a 28' x 36' detached garage at 2042- <br />2044 Dale Street North, legally described as follows: <br /> <br />The South 76.5 feet of the North 1328.5 feet of the West 300 feet of the <br />Northwest Quarter of Section 13, Township 29, Range 23, Ramsey County, <br />subject to Dale Street (PIN 132923220009); and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the <br />request on Wednesday I July 8, 1998, and recommended approval of the requested <br />variance; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council received the Planning Commission's <br />recommendation on Monday I July 27, 1998, and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council made the following findings: <br /> <br />1. The proposed variance is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of <br />the City's Comprehensive Plan and Title 10 of the City Code (Zoning). <br />Section 1004.01 of the City Code allows one detached garage and limits the <br /> <br />Resolution _ - Page 1 of 2 <br />