Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br />~ <br />o <br />o <br />N <br />~ <br />(? <br /> <br />:;f <br /> <br />? F~(':).(j <br /> <br />.... <br /> <br />OFFICE CO. RECORDEH <br />RM"iSEY COUNTY {.p: <br />Cf:TtT Rr-rOPC-,fTj ,).:" <br />~.~I\ . \'v~.'" .\. J-~....., \..I.~ <br /> <br />ZOUO APR 21 PI: I W . <br /> <br /> <br />COUNTY RECORDER <br />8y-----..JllJ- [JEPUTY <br /> <br />~~ <br /> <br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES <br />OF MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL. <br />OF THE.~~ry OF ROSEVILLE <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />*. <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of <br />Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly held on the 29th day of June 1999, at 6:30 p.m. <br /> <br />The following members were present: Mastel, Wiski, Maschka <br />and the following were absent: Goedeke, Wall <br /> <br />Council Member Maschka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> <br />Resolution No. 9659 <br />Resolution Approving a 17 foot Driveway Access Point (apron) <br />Setback Variance at 2752 Matilda Street <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Section 703.04B(4) ofthe Roseville City Code requires a minimum driveway <br />access point (apron) setback from a street corner of 30 feet; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Russell Dansare, property owner, (hereinafter "applicant") ofthe lot at 2752 <br />Matilda Street, has applied for a 17 foot variance to allow a reduction in the 30 foot required <br />setback that would enable him to retain his driveway and street access (apron) in its current <br />location; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, The City's Pavement Management Program and the reconstruction of Matilda <br />Street have prompted the variance request; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the request <br />on Wednesday, June 9,1999, and recommended (6-0) approval of the requested variance; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville City. Council received the Planning Commission's <br />recommendation on Tuesday, June 29, 1999; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council made the following findings: <br /> <br />[ (f(f- 3 <br /> <br />,'\ "'- <br />,..\i0. ~ <br />~"~"\'0'~~\I\i ~~.:;t;Ad <br />1I"'l..>" ......"''-'''''jVO <br /> <br />{~~ <br />(q,-)7) <br />ca-~ <br />~~ <br /> <br />/Vc9 <br />J..:."')r <br />