Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />ROSEVILLE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION <br />1 <br />MEETING MINUTES FOR <br />2 <br />JUNE 2, 2015 <br />3 <br />ROSEVILLE CITY HALL ~ 6:30pm <br />4 <br />5 <br /> <br />PRESENT: <br />6 Becker-Finn, Bogenholm, Diedrick, Doneen, Gelbach, Heikkila, Holt, Newby, <br />7 O’Brien, Stoner <br />STAFF: <br />8 Anfang, Brokke <br />OTHERS: <br />9 Roger Hess Jr. <br />10 <br /> <br /> INTRODUCTIONS <br />11 1. <br />12 <br /> ROLL CALL/PUBLIC COMMENT <br />13 2. <br />14 No initial public comment at this time. <br /> <br /> <br />15 Community member Roger Hess Jr. joined the commission meeting for the follow up <br />16 discussion on the Cedarholm Golf Course. <br />17 <br /> APPROVAL OF MINUTES – MAY 5, 2015 MEETING <br />18 3. <br />19 May 5, 2015 minutes approved with a clarification by Nancy O’Brien for the reporting listed on <br />20 line 62. <br /> <br /> <br />21 On May 5 2015, O’Brien inquired as to whether staff has studied the time spent by Golf <br />22 Course personnel on tasks away from the course and elsewhere in the parks & recreation <br />23 system as well as, the amount of time being spent on work being done by other parks & <br /> <br />24 recreation staff at the golf course. <br />25 <br /> <br /> PARK DEDICATION – 2715 LONG LAKE ROAD <br />26 4. <br />27 Brokke briefed the commission on the identified property. What makes this park dedication <br />28 discussion unique is that it deals with a CIC (Common Interest Community). Proposed work at this <br />29 property triggers a park dedication discussion because the property owner is expanding the existing <br />30 foot print resulting in a replat of the property. <br /> <br /> <br />31 Commission discussed what criteria trigger discussions on park dedication. <br /> <br />32 <br />Commission Recommendation: <br />33 <br /> <br /> <br />34 Motion by Holt, second by Gelbach, to recommend the Council accept cash in lieu of land <br />35 for park dedication on the 2715 Long Lake Road redevelopment. <br /> <br /> <br />36 Motion passed unanimously. <br />37 <br /> FOLLOW UP TO THE CEDARHOLM GOLF COURSE TOUR <br />38 5. <br />39 Following a brief introduction by Chairman Stoner the Commission moved right into questions. <br />40 Commissioners inquired into; <br /> <br /> <br />41 profit & loss discussions <br /> <br /> <br />42 how we can make the GC work from a property management perspective <br /> <br /> <br />43 who the golf course users are <br /> <br /> <br />44 ways to absorb costs into the greater City budget <br />45 Commissioners also spoke toward; <br /> <br /> <br />46 looking at the big picture for the golf course and addressing financial considerations beyond <br />47 just capital needs <br /> <br /> <br />48 recognizing the golf course’s true value to our community <br /> <br /> <br />49 recognizing the level of financial deficit over the past few years <br /> <br /> <br />