Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />ROSEVILLE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION <br />MEETING MINUTES FOR <br />SEPTEMBER 1, 2015 <br />Langton Lake Park Walking Tour ~ 6:00pm <br />Sandcastle Park ~ 6:45pm <br /> <br />PRESENT: <br /> Becker-Finn, Bogenholm, Diedrick, Doneen, Gelbach, Holt, Newby, O’Brien, Stoner <br />ABSENT: <br /> Heikkila notified staff ahead of time of absence <br />STAFF: <br /> Anfang, Brokke <br /> <br /> <br /> INTRODUCTIONS <br />1. <br /> <br /> ROLL CALL/PUBLIC COMMENT <br />2. <br />Community members Sherry Sanders & Lisa McCormick plus Andy Berg & 3 representatives from the <br />Rosedale project in attendance. <br /> <br /> <br />Sherry Sanders extended an invitation to the Commission to visit Tamarack Park <br /> <br /> <br />Other guest deferred comment until later in the meeting <br /> <br /> APPROVAL OF MINUTES – August 4, 2015 MEETING <br />3. <br />th <br />August 4 minutes approved unanimously. Doneen abstained from vote because he was not at the August <br /> <br />meeting. <br /> <br /> <br />4. <br />DEBRIEF FOLLOWING TOUR OF LANGTON LAKE PARK IN RELATION TO TWIN LAKES AREA <br />The Commission met at 6:00pm tonight at Langton Lake Park to tour park properties in relation to proposed <br />Twin Lakes development. Commission members then convened for their September meeting at 6:45pm at <br />Sandcastle Park. Commission follow-up discussion included; <br /> <br /> <br />Holt suggested the Commission work to solidify the opportunity for developments to be flagged <br />when received by Community Development. <br /> <br />Look into the possibility of creating a City document that leads to flagging projects that have <br />o <br />implications to the parks <br /> <br /> <br />Stoner commented on the minimal distance/buffer between development areas & park land. <br />Suggested looking into plantings that grow into a natural barrier of sorts. <br /> <br /> <br />Becker-Finn added comments on the amount of potential sound developments could bring to the <br />area’s park. <br /> <br /> <br />O’Brien asked about the footpath neighbors had spoken of at an earlier Commission meeting. <br /> <br />Stoner inquired into whether development plans included a sidewalk along the parkway. <br />o <br /> <br /> PARK DEDICATION – ROSEDALE MALL EXPANSION <br />5. <br />Brokke briefed Commission on the proposed development on the north side of Rosedale between Penney’s <br />& DSW. This project involves a replatting of the area and triggers a park dedication recommendation. The <br />role of the Commission, at this time, is to recommend to the Council accepting cash in lieu of land (7% of <br />the FMV, $102,300 or .105 acres of land). <br /> <br /> <br />Doneen commented that a land dedication of this size does not make much sense. <br /> <br />Commission Recommendation: <br />Commissioner Doneen moved recommending the Council that cash in lieu of land be accepted for park <br />dedication with the Rosedale Mall Expansion. Second by Holt. Motion passed unanimously <br /> <br />No public comment took place on this item. <br /> <br /> <br />