Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />ROSEVILLE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION <br />1 <br />MEETING MINUTES FOR <br />2 <br />OCTOBER 6, 2015 <br />3 <br />ROSEVILLE CITY HALL - 6:30pm <br />4 <br /> <br />5 <br />PRESENT: <br />6 Becker-Finn, Diedrick, Gelbach, Heikkila, Holt, Newby, Stoner <br />ABSENT: <br />7 Bogenholm, Doneen, O’Brien, notified staff ahead of time of absence <br />STAFF: <br />8 Anfang, Brokke <br />9 <br /> <br /> INTRODUCTIONS <br />10 1. <br />11 <br /> ROLL CALL/PUBLIC COMMENT <br />12 2. <br />13 No Public Comment <br />14 <br /> APPROVAL OF MINUTES – September 1, 2015 MEETING <br />15 3. <br />st <br /> <br />16 September 1 minutes approved unanimously. <br />17 <br /> <br /> PARK DEDICATION USE of FUNDS <br />18 4. <br />19 Brokke provided a brief background on the use of Park Dedication funds. <br />20 <br /> <br />21 Stoner followed with a summary of an earlier meeting with the Finance Commission and reviewed <br />22 the draft Funding Policy suggested by Mayor Roe. <br /> <br /> <br />23 Gelbach suggested amending the policy to include a specified minimum balance for the fund <br />24 dedicated to property acquisition. <br /> <br /> <br />25 Stoner suggested fully funding the acquisition fund to the specified minimum balance from <br />26 the current Park Dedication fund. <br /> <br /> <br />27 Gelbach suggested setting the minimum balance for the acquisition fund at $1M. <br /> <br /> <br />28 Newby brought to the attention of the Commission the specific language in the Policy that <br />29 addresses the potential to transfer funds between the acquisition fund and the improvements <br />30 fund. <br /> <br />31 Commission-wide discussion followed on the potential uses of funds. <br />o <br /> <br /> <br />32 Commissioners recommended that lines 26 through 28 from the draft policy be eliminated. <br /> <br /> <br />33 Commissioners recommended that lines 30 & 31 be reworded to read; <br /> <br />34 The City Council may transfer funds between the sub-funds of the Park Dedication <br />o <br />35 Fund as appropriate for projected capital spending and acquisition needs after a <br />36 minimum balance of $1,000,000 is met for acquisitions. <br /> <br /> <br />37 Stoner confirmed that the Commission was in favor of the 1/3 – 2/3 split with 1/3 of future <br />38 Park Dedication funds going to the acquisition fund and 2/3 going to the improvements fund <br />39 once the acquisition fund reaches its specified minimum balance. <br />40 <br /> PARK DEDICATION: ANNUAL RATE REVIEW <br />41 5. <br />42 Brokke summarized the materials in the Commission packet. <br /> <br /> <br />43 Holt commented on the current residential rate and suggested that in the future to possibly <br />44 consider using the Fair Market Value (FMV) % or increasing the per unit rate based on <br />45 current residential values. <br /> <br /> <br />46 Stoner suggested hearing from Community Development Director Bilotta on forecasts for <br />47 future development. <br />Commission Recommendation: <br />48 <br />49 Commissioner Diedrick moved to recommend that the 2016 Residential & Commercial Park <br />50 Dedication rates remain the same as in 2015. Second by Gelbach. Motion passed unanimously. <br /> <br /> <br />