res_8812 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

BXTRACT OP KIHOTBS OP HZBTING OP CITY COUNCIL CITY OP ROSBVILLB RAKSBY COUNTY, KIHHBSOTA Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the city council of the City of Roseville met in regular session at the City Hall on Monday, the twenty- second day of June, 1992, at 7:30 o'clock p.m. The following members were present: Thomas, Cushman, Maschka, P. Johnson, and V. Johnson and the following were absent: None. Councilperson Cushman introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 8812 RBSOLUTION RBCBIVING PBASIBILITY RBPORT AND PROVIDING POR PUBLIC HBARING ON IMPROVEMENT HUKÐBR M-92-25 BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville as follows: 1. By resolution adopted May 26, 1992, the Council directed the City Public Works Director to prepare a preliminary report as to the feasibility of the proposed improvement M-92-25, reconstruction of railroad crossing on Terminal Road east of Walnut street. 2. The Public Works Director was also directed to include in the report the estimated cost of the proposed improvement and as to whether such improvement should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement. The preliminary report and cost estimates have been submitted and considered by the Council and are hereby approved and directed to be placed on file in the office of the City Manager. The improvement proposed to be made in the general manner set forth in the report is designated as M-92-25. 3. The Council shall meet at the City Hall, 2660 civic Center Drive, in said City, on July 13, 1992, at 7:30 o'clock p.m. for the purpose of holding a public hearing on the proposed improvement under and pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota statutes, Chapter 429, and the Manager is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place, and purpose of that meeting to be published twice in the official newspaper, Roseville Review, which publications shall be a week apart, and the second publication shall be not less than three days before the date of the hearing. 4. The notice shall be in substantially the following form: (see attachment) 5. The general nature, estimated cost and area proposed to be assessed for Improvement No. M-92-25 is determined to be as stated in the foregoing notice, as fully as though the same were separately set forth and resolved herein.