res_314 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Extract of l'dnutes of heeting of the Village Council, Village of Roseville County of rtarr,sey, State of Minnesota r, J jl PUrsuant to due call and notice thereof, c:. regnlar meeting of the Village Council of the \Tj nage oi' "Ro~eville, Ransey County, hinnesota, w~s duly held in the village hall at 2701 H. Lexington Ave., St. PI3.1l1, Hinnesota, on Tuesday, the 22nd of December, 195'9, at 8:00 t.M. The follow:;ng members ..rere present: Cedarholm, Keene, Carlson, Shiolcs and the following were absent: Brennan Trustee .shields introdncerl the following resolution cmd moved its adoption: RESOLU'J'ICN #31u RELATING TO AFFORTIONhENT OF ASSESSHEN'l'S RETJA.'1'ING TO S"A.NITARY SE'!TSR IIvIFRC'ffi';BNT :'JU. 2 BF IT RESOIV~f! by the Village Council of the Village of Roseville, lYiinnesota, as follo..rs: "rrIEREAS the assessment roll for Sanitar~r Sewer Improvement No. 2 as last finally amended o.nd ndopted on November 9, 1959, was filer) ana certified to the County Auditor of~rn~sey County on December 10, 1959, for the purpose of including inst~ll~ rrents thereof to be collected along with real est9.te taxes cOll1r:lencing in 1960, and :'T}IEREAS parcels of property as contained i1" the original assessment roll as certified, have since been divided and conveyed by property owners, and TI'THEREPS the County Auditor of Ramsey County requires that apportionI".ent of original assessment against each original tract where it has later been divided, sold or conveyed be made by the Village Council of the Village of Roseville in order that the proper assessment can be extended by the Countylludi to,r against each parcel of property thereafter, after the same has been conveyed and divided, to co~~ence with the assessment to be collected in the year 1960 and thereafter. NOW THEREFORE, the Village Council of the Village of Roseville does hereby make the following apportionment of an original assessment as contained in said assessment roll of November 9, 1959 against the followinr:r described properties: Criginal Assessment: See No. 60 & 62 Apportionment: Subj. to Hamline Ave; the N 500 ft of S 860 ft of E 400 ft of }~ 1/4 of SW 1/4 of Sec. 3. Snbj. to Co. Rd. Ave. & esmts & ex S 165 ft of W 100 ft of E 893 ft & ex N 500 ft of S 860 ft of E uOO ft & ex S 300 ft of E 623 ft; the NEl of S\<T?t of Sec. 3 Subj to Co Rd. Ave & esmts & ex S 165 ft of W 100 ft of E 893 ft & ex N 607 ft of S 967 ft of E 623 ft & ex S 300 ft of E 623 ft; the NE ~ of ~d?t of Sec. 3 Subj to Ave; the tJ 607 ft of 3 967 ft of E 623 ft of tffi i of Sw ~ of Sec. 3. Od ginal Assessment: Subj to Ave & Rd & Ex E 1075 ft & ex part S of N 1446 ft of v~ 500 ft of E 2075 ft; See No. 88 part, N of Ry R/4, of Se~ of Sec. 4 (the N 400' not assessed) ~3, 591.25 16,)93.75 13,792.50 6,392.50 29,137.50