Laserfiche WebLink
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of <br />Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was held on the 29`'' day of March 2010, at 6:00 p.m. <br />The following Members were present: Roe; Pust; Ihlan; Johnson; and Klausing; <br />and no Members were absent. <br />Council Member Klausing introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 10800 <br />A RESOLUTION DENYING A 125-FOOT TELECOMMUNICATION TOWER <br />FACILITY AS A CONDITIONAL USE IN ACCORDANCE WITH §1013.10 AND <br />§1014.01 OF THE ROSEVILLE CITY CODE FOR CLEARWIRE LLC AND CITY OF <br />ROSEVILLE (PF09-032) <br />WHEREAS, City of Roseville owns the property at 286 County Road C; and <br />WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as: <br />SECTION 12 TOWN 29 RANGE 23 S 400 FT OF N 930 FT OF E 82 5/10 FT OF W 1309 <br />2/10 FT OF NE 1/4 (SUBJ TO RDS AND ESMTS) IN SEC 12 TN 29 RN 23 <br />PIN: 12-29-23-12-0002 <br />WHEREAS, Clearwire LLC in conjunction with the property owner seeks to allow the <br />construction of a 125-foot telecommunication tower to be owned by City of Roseville, which is a <br />conditionally permitted use in the applicable Park & Open Space Zoning District; and <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council has found that: <br />1. as the co-applicant and property owner in the proposal, the City of Roseville does <br />not support the application at this time; and <br />2. the City of Roseville lacks a policy that adequately addresses the location of <br />telecommunication infrastructure on City-owned properties to minimize negative <br />impacts with respect to the standard conditional use review criteria. <br />NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Roseville City Council, to DENY the <br />proposed CONDITIONAL USE in accordance with Sections § 1014.01 and § 1013.10 of the <br />Roseville City Code. <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council <br />Member Johnson and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: Roe; Pust; <br />Johnson; and Klausing; <br />and Ihlan voted against; <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />Page 1 of 2 <br />