Laserfiche WebLink
<br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING <br />OF CITY COUNCIL <br />CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br />RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City <br />Council of the City of Roseville, Minnesota, was duly held at the City <br />Hall in said city on Monday, the thirteenth day of December, 1993, at <br />7:30 p.m. <br /> <br />The following members were present: Goedeke, P. Johnson, Maschka, <br />Cushman, and V. Johnson and the following were absent: None. <br /> <br />councilperson Goedeke introduced and moved the adoption of the <br />following resolution: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 9020 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION DECLARING ADEQUACY OF PETITION <br />AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF FEASIBILITY <br />REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT NO. P-94-06 <br /> <br />WHEREAS, a petition requesting an improvement in the City of Roseville <br />by the construction of Arthur Street north of existing Arthur Street <br />north of County Road C in the Twin Lakes area with the installation of <br />bituminous pavement, concrete curb and gutter, drainage facilities, <br />necessary sanitary sewer and watermain extensions facilities. and <br />necessary appurtenances filed with the council on December 13, 1993, is <br />hereby declared to be signed by the required percentage of owners of <br />property affected thereby pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section <br />429.035. <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA: <br /> <br />That the petition be referred to the City Public Works Director and the <br />designated project consulting engineer, BRW, for study and that they are <br />instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed, advising <br />the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement <br />is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in <br />connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the <br />improvement as recommended. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly <br />seconded by Councilperson P. Johnson and upon vote being taken thereon, <br />the following voted in favor thereof: Goedeke, P. Johnson, Maschka, <br />Cushman, and V. Johnson and the following voted against the same: None. <br /> <br />Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />