Laserfiche WebLink
<br />LXT1(ACT OF >iINUfES OF flEETING OF TIlE VILLAGE COlNCIL <br />OF ROSEVILLE, l'HNNESOTA, HELD MARUI 8, 1971 <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />~: <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and. notice thereof, a rep.-ular meeting <br />of the Village COlll1cil of the Village of Roseville, [finnesota, <br />was duly calleJ at the Village !Iall, 2701 North Lexington Avenue, <br />at 7: 30 P .rl., on i'Jonday, 1'larch 8, 1971. <br /> <br />The follm,;ing members were present: Mayor Moll, COlD1cilJren <br />Anderson, Linebarger, Curley and Grauel <br /> <br />and the followiI1g were absent: None <br /> <br />j.brnbe l' Curley <br />moveJ its adoption: <br /> <br />introduced the following resolution and <br /> <br />m~SOLUTION NO. 5619 <br /> <br />Wm:REA:;, a bill for an act, House Pile No. 69, has been <br />introduced relating to the taxation of real property <br />and proviJing exceptions for improvements of certain <br />properties, specifically that: <br /> <br />"in detennining the value of lands for the purposes of <br />taxation, the first $4,000.00 worth of improvements <br />ner dwellDl[' unit... more than 40 veal'S old shall not <br />be regardectas increasing the value of such property <br />for a period of 10 years from the date of SUdl <br />improvements ... and <br /> <br />hHEREAS, special legislation has been in effect in llar.lsey Cot.ll1ty <br />since 1967 providing for a similar delayed inclusion in <br />the value of improvenents in the property assessment, and <br />such legislC1tion has failed to achieve its objective be- <br />cause of the failure of the Ramsey COW1ty Assessor to <br />reassess properties every tHO years as required by <br />statute, now therefore be it resolved that: <br /> <br />The Village Cmmcil of the Village of Roseville, '!innesota, <br />is opposed to the passage of House File No. 69 lll1til and <br />unless as a sequel to such legislation provision is made <br />which would insure that property valuations be kept current <br />as required but not practiced tmder present statute. <br />