Laserfiche WebLink
<br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING <br />OF CITY COUNCIL <br />CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br />RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA <br /> <br />A regular meeting of the Council of the City ofRoseville, Minnesota, was held in the City Hall on <br />the eleventh day of September, 1995, at 5:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> <br />The following members were present: P. Johnson, Mastel, Wiski, Goedeke, and V. Johnson, and <br />the following were absent: None. <br /> <br />The City Manager presented to the Council the 1995 assessment rolls for the following projects: <br /> <br />M-94-01 <br />P-93-10 <br />P-93-16-47 <br />P-94-02-44 <br /> <br />P-94-02-61 <br />P-94-02-65 <br />P-94-02-69 <br />P-94-02-48 <br /> <br />P-94-02-50 <br />P-94-02-52 <br />P-94-02-53 <br />ST -94-04 <br />P-94-06 <br />P-94-09 <br />UL-95-13 <br /> <br />Diseased trees <br />Lincoln Drive, County Road C-2 to Lydia Drive <br />Midland Grove Condominium entrance road <br />Eustis Street, S1. Croix Street, S1. Stephen Street, Marion Road, <br />Laurie Road, T. H. 36 Service Drive <br />Oxford Street, Sherren Street, Milton Street <br />Sandhurst Drive, Grotto Street, Sherren Street <br />South T. H. 36 Service Drive <br />Sharondale Avenue, Wilder Street, Skillman Avenue, Eldridge <br />Avenue, Shryer Avenue, Ryan Avenue, Draper Drive, Prior <br />Avenue, Tatum Street, Loren Road <br />Midlothian Road, Haddington Road, Laurie Road <br />Ridgewood Lane North and South <br />Mid Oaks Lane and Mid Oaks Road <br />Neighborhood 44 storm sewer <br />Arthur Street construction <br />Twin Lakes development area regional storm sewer pond <br />Patton Road north of County Road C to end of cul-de-sac, street lights <br /> <br />Councilmember Wiski introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 9221 <br /> <br />. <br />RESOLUTION CONTINUING ASSESSMENT HEARINGS TO <br />SEPTEMBER 25, 1995 <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City Council held public hearings on September 11, 1995, for special assessment <br />rolls; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, questions and objections regarding the assessment rolls were raised by property <br />owners at the public hearings; <br />