Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Extract of Minutes of Meeting <br />of City Council <br />City of Roseville <br />Ramsey County, Minnesota <br /> <br />Held: September 8, 1980 <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting <br /> <br />of the city Council of the City of Roseville, Minnesota, was <br /> <br />duly held in the city Hall in said City on Monday, the 8th day <br /> <br />of September, 1980, at 7:30 o'clock p. m. <br /> <br />The following members were present: Mayor Demos and <br /> <br />Councilmen Anderson, Curley, Franke and Kehri and the following <br /> <br />were absent: None. <br /> <br />Councilman Anderson introduced the following resolution <br /> <br />and moved its adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 7003 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING <br />ASSESSMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENT NO. P-77-3 <br /> <br />BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville, <br /> <br />Minnesota, as follows: <br /> <br />1. The amount proper and necessary to be specially <br />assessed at this time for Improvement No. P-77-3 against every <br />assessable lot, piece or parcel of land affected thereby has <br />been duly calculated upon the basis of benefits, without regard <br />to cash valuation, in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota <br />Statutes, Chapter 429, as amended, and notice has been duly <br />mailed and published, as required by law, that this Council would <br />meet to hear, consider and pass upon all objections, if any, <br />and said proposed assessment has at all times since its filing been <br />open for public inspection, and an opportunity has been given to <br />all interested persons to present their objections, if any, to such <br />proposed assessments. <br /> <br />2. This Council, having heard and considered all objec- <br />tions so presented at a public assessment hearing on August 25, <br />1980, and being fully advised in the premises, finds that each of <br />the lots, pieces and parcels of land enumerated in the proposed assess- <br />ment was and is specially benefited by the construction of said <br />improvement in not less than the amount of the assessment set opposite <br />