11-29-10-R - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—November 29, 2010 7 7.A. Presbyterian Homes Redevelopment Proposal(continued) significant landscaping around it. She stated she would like to be sure this coverage is maintained now that the parking lot has been extended. City Planner Beekman stated as part of the conditions of approval they will submit updated plans as part of the submittal prior to the issuances of a building permits. The number of caliper inches would need to remain static but they may be pushed back to accommodate the south parking lot as it is proposed at this time. Additional coverage for this parking lot can be added as a condition of approval. Mayor Harpstead clarified the proposal pertains to the two lots only and not the triangle or other property owned by Presbyterian Homes. City Planner Beekman stated only the legal lot descriptions for the two lots are in the resolutions and approval does not extend into other properties that Presbyterian Homes owns. MOTION: Councilmember McClung moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to Approve Resolution 2010-064 for the Rezoning of the Presbyterian Homes Addition of Arden Hills from R-2 to R-4. Councilmember Holden asked if the City wanted to approve the rezoning prior to the approval of the PUD because the PUD may not be approved. City Attorney Filla recommended the City not approve this resolution as drafted unless the City takes action on all of the proposals being presented. The reason this resolution was presented first is because the other motions and resolutions, especially the one pertaining to the PUD, anticipates the mixed use that this resolution enables. This motion can be moved to be considered before the PUD is considered. Councilmember McClung withdrew his motion. Councilmember Holmes withdrew her second to the motion. MOTION: Councilmember McClung moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to Approve Resolution 2010-065 for the Presbyterian Homes Addition of Arden Hills Preliminary and Final Plat. ^ Councilmember Grant stated he did not believe that due diligence has been done on the traffic counts on the south exit as they relate to County Road D and Wheeler Avenue. He stated it would be a good idea to have this looked into because this is an item of interest for residents. Councilmember Holmes asked if a condition could be added that addressed the traffic counts in this location. City Planner Beekman clarified that conditions could be added to the approval of the Planned Unit Development.