My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4L, Eureka Recycling Contract Extension
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
12-13-10- R
>
4L, Eureka Recycling Contract Extension
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2024 10:25:02 AM
Creation date
2/2/2011 9:31:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
12-13-10 Regular City Counicl Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
are also incorparating forms of revenue share in their coniracts; however, ihe nature of the <br />revenue sharing with these cornpanies is designed to share the risk of a dip in post consumer <br />prices �rrith the cities they serve, as well as share in the revenue when prices are higher. Eureka's <br />revenu� share program has a floor; whereby the City would never have to pay more t�an our <br />basa cost if prices dropped again. <br />The City o� Shoreview negotiated a new recycling contract with Allied Waste in August of 2010, <br />whzch resulted in a seven percent increase in the cost of their recycling services. Similarly, the <br />City of New Brighton negotiated a new contract with Allied Waste that resulted in a five percent <br />increase in their service costs. <br />The Ciiy of Maplewood vvent out for an RFP for recycling services this year as well and received <br />six responses. Their current cantract with Eureka did not allow for an exten.sion of service. <br />Maplewood found that Eureka'� bid price was 22 percent higher than their existing contracted <br />price. Even with the increase in price Maplewood 5taff recommended Eureka after reviewing <br />the other bids; however, the Maplewood Council chose another company based an their desire <br />far single-sort recycling service as opposed io dual-sort. <br />Roseville currently contracts with Eureka Recycling and is in the process of ext�nding �heir <br />contract as well. As part af that process, Roseville went out for an RFP far recycling services; <br />they had found that the lowest bid was 12 percent Y�igher than their existing Eureka Recycling <br />contract and ihat the cost of recycling services had increased dramatically since their last RFP <br />�iree years ago. While the Arden Hills and Roseviile contracts with Eureka a�e structured <br />slightly di�ferently, Staff be�ieves that our current contract is very favorable compared with the <br />cost of service from other providers. <br />Staff is recommending the Ciiy Council approve both one-year extensions to the current Eureica <br />Recycling con�ract. <br />Re ues�ed Ac#ion <br />Approve the renewal of the City's contract with Eureka Rec�cling �or curbside recycling <br />services extending the current contract for ara ac�ditional two years. <br />Attachments <br />A. Eureka Recycling Contract and Amendment No. 1 <br />B. Letter from E�reka Recycting dated July 30, 2d10 <br />Crty ofArden Hills <br />City Counczl Meeting for December 13, 2010 <br />11Metro-rnet. uslardenhillsl�3drninlCouncrll�gendas & 1'acket Informatron12010412-13-1 D RegularlPacket Informaiionll2-13-10 - Regulat' <br />Meetrng - Eureka Recycling Corrtraci - Memo.doc <br />Page 4 af 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.