Laserfiche WebLink
___ _ ...... <br />❑ DESIGN CONSTRAINT #2 <br />Review atl phasing optians %r cost effectiveness, viability, need, etc. to see if all four <br />entrance/exit ramps on a new diarnond interchange are needed and provide Ciming and <br />phasing of project. <br />❑ CITY PERSPECTIVE <br />City would like to preserve local access for residents while �ninimizing impacts to the <br />residential and business community located within t�e "triangle" area. The City would <br />like to review timing of vvhen the sauth bound Highway 10 exit ram�p in.to TCAAP <br />would be needed, if at all. In addition, a cos�lfinancial plan needs to be provided to <br />ascertain if phasing is or will be cost effective. <br />o DESIGN CONSTRAINT #3 <br />Review to dete�-mine how safe access for Scherer Brothers can be provided in the interim <br />and long-tezxn based upon phasing plan for the interchange. <br />❑ CITY PERSPECTIVE <br />City would iike to provide safe access while minimizing ir�pacts to Arden Manor. This <br />cauld include inter�m solution of direct access until the exit ramp is possibly needed <br />(right in, righC out), moving the access road closer ta Highway l0 z� the south bound exit <br />ramp is not needed ini�ially and �oving the access roaci which leads onto the new diarnond <br />interchange as far northeast towards khe southbound Highway 10 exit ramp as possible. <br />❑ DESIGN CONSTRAINT #4 <br />Review costs associated with realignit�g Highway 1D and the interchange further <br />northeast. <br />❑ CITY PERSPECT�VE <br />City would like to �ninimize impacts to Arden Manor, but needs to be assured project <br />salution is cost effecti�e. City would like to review costs of reaiignment, beginning and <br />terminus of realignrnent, impacts to property further soutl� of County Road 96 and <br />quatity of existing roads to determine if they are in need of replacement. Realignment <br />could include a few options such as moving tYze south lane further north, moving both <br />lanes further north (b�tt within MnDOT ROW) or maving bath lanes further north onto <br />the TCAAP site. If the quality of the road bed is �n poor condition and in need of <br />repXacezxient, then that cost should �e subtracted from the realignm�nt options being <br />considered. <br />I-694 and Highway 10 and County Road 96 Preliminary Design Position Paper 4 <br />