Laserfiche WebLink
_ . _ _ _ <br />B. Cond'etion of Building Test <br />1. Building Inspection <br />The first step in the evaluation process is the building inspection. After an initial <br />walk-thru, the inspector makes a judgement whether or not a building "appears" to <br />have enough defects or deficiencies of sufficient total significance ta justify <br />substantial renovation ar clearance. If it daes, the inspector documents with notes and <br />photographs code and non-code def ciencies in the building. <br />2. Replaceme�t Cost <br />The second step in evalua.ting a building to determine if it is substandard to a degree <br />requiring substantial renovation or clearance is to determine i#s replacement cosi. <br />This is the cost of constructing a new structure of the same square footage and type on <br />site. Replacement costs were researched using R.S. _Means Cost Works square foot <br />models for 20l 0. <br />A replacement cost was calculated by first establishing buaIding use (office, retail, <br />residential, etc.), building construction type (wood, concrete, masonry, etc.), and <br />building size to abtain the appropriate median replacement cast, which factors in the <br />costs oi constructian in Arden Hills, Minnesota. <br />Replacement cost inc�Udes labor, materials, anc� the contractor's overhead and profit. <br />Replacement costs do not include architectural fees, iegal fees or other "soft" costs <br />noi directly related to construction activities. Replacement cost for each building is <br />tabulated in Appendix A. <br />3. Code Deficiencies <br />The next step in evaluating a building is to determine w�at code deficiencies exist <br />with respect io such building. Code deficiencies are those conditions for a buiIding <br />which are not in complian.ce with current building codes applicable to new buildings <br />in the State oi Minnesota. <br />Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Suhdivisron 10{c), specifically provides that a <br />building cannot be considered str�cturally substandard if its code deficiencies are not <br />at least 15 percent of the repIacement cost of the buildit�g. As a result, it was <br />necessary to determine the extent of code de�ciencies far each bui�ding in the <br />proposed TIF District. <br />The e�aluatian was made by re�ie�wing all aeailable information wiih respect to s�ach <br />buiidings contained in City Building Ir�spection records and making interior anci <br />exteriar inspections of the buildings. LHB utilizes the 2007 Minnesota State Building <br />Code as tl�e official code for our evaluations. The Minnesota State Building Cade is <br />actually a series of provisional codes written speci�ca�ly for Minnesota only <br />Page 8 <br />