4C Minor Subdivision, Lot Consolidation, and Rezoning for a City Owned Parcel, PID #22 30 23 42 0007, and 1330 Indian Oaks Circle

Home Browse Search

August b, 2008, DRAFT P�anning Commission Minutes PLANNING CASE #�8�019• Minor Subdivision Lot Consolidation and Rezonin • 1330 Indian Oaks Circle• Ci oi Arden Hil�s — Pub�ic Hearin City Planner I Meagan Beek�man reported that the City of Arden Hills is requesting a minar subdivisian and lot consolidation to subd'avide a 1,011 square foot partion of a 6.67 acre (72,745 square feet} City-owned parcel and consolidate it with a residential property located at 1330 Indian Oaks Circle. In addiiian, the City requests that the subdivided portion be rezoned from I-1, Limited Tndustrial, to R-J., Single Family Residential. She provided background and stated that t1�e �taffrecommen�ed approval, subject ta the following condition: �. The City shall file ih� minor subdivision and consolidation vcrith the Ramsey County recorder. Ms. Beekman showed an aerial oi the property and pointed out that that the rezoning is the portion that rec��ires a hearing and the bold line is the new praperty line. She also showed the proposed Certificate of Survey and sorr�e photos. Commissioner Holewa inq�ired why this did not require two motions. Ms. Beekman replied that it was because they are contingent on each other. Coznmissioner Holewa inquired as to how they would proceed today if somet.�ing was encroaching on City land. Ms. Beekman repiied that it vcrould depend on the property owner. She staied that, in this case, the property owner is wilting to cooperate with the City. Commissioner Holewa stated that, in this case, it is a foreclosure. He inquired whether a new buyer wouid know this is in existence when they bought it. Ms. Beekrnan replied that the informatian regarding ihe legal settlemeni would not necessarily be attached to the deed of ihe property, but a n�w survey would be recorded with the deed and the County and show the new property lines. Commissioner Holewa inquired as to how they would pratect the new owner. Chair Larson replied that ihere is usually a title seaxch and title insurance to protect the new owner. He stated that, if it was private property the encroachment was on, it could be a different situa�ion. Com�nissioner Halewa inquired whether the new owner wauld be on the hook for $25,000 if the property owner sold it. Ms. Beekman replied that it was her understanding that that would be made clear throngh the title insurance.