My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4C Minor Subdivision, Lot Consolidation, and Rezoning for a City Owned Parcel, PID #22 30 23 42 0007, and 1330 Indian Oaks Circle
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
08-25-08-R
>
4C Minor Subdivision, Lot Consolidation, and Rezoning for a City Owned Parcel, PID #22 30 23 42 0007, and 1330 Indian Oaks Circle
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2024 9:42:34 AM
Creation date
2/9/2011 4:22:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
8/25/2008 Council Regular
General - Type
8/25/2008 Council Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chair Larson stated that if ihe legal settlement was not settled them this would be <br />considered a"cloud" on the title. Ms. Beekman stated that the City attempted to <br />negotiate with the original property owner and do civil negotiatians. She stated <br />that, at that time, the property changed owners. The City reopened the <br />negotiations, but was not succe�sful. At that poi��, legal action was taken. After <br />a year, the property went into foreclosure. <br />Commissianer Holewa inquired whether the new buyEr knew anything about it <br />when he bought it. Ms. Beekrnan replied that she did not have that information. <br />Chair Larson opened the Public Hearing at 6:43 p.aix�, and inquired whether <br />anyone wishing to speak regaarding this case. <br />There was no response. <br />Chair Larson closed the Public Hearing 6:44 p.m. <br />Chair Larson and asked the Commission if they had any fiirther discussion or <br />questions. <br />Cor�unissioner Modesette stated that there were three parts to the motion. Sh� <br />wondered why the consolidation of the lot, which is us�ally done by the County, <br />was noi a condition, rather than being part of the motion. Ms. Beekanan replied <br />that this is an extremely unique situation. In a typical situation, the lot <br />cansolidation would take piace and the City would need to approve thai. In this <br />case, it was a single redrawing of lines. Staff chase to break it down to have three <br />separate aspects. <br />Commissioner Modesette inquired wheiher, because it was consolidated, it will <br />appear on the t� roles as a s�parate parcel, which would require som� papeztivork <br />down at the County. Ms. Beekrnazi stated that was co�-eci. She stated tI�at the <br />City would be filing it. <br />Discussion ensued. <br />Commissioner Sand inquired wheiher the boundary line is following the existing <br />fence. Ms. Beekman stated that was correci. <br />Commissioner Thompson inqui�ed as to what they have in place now to prevent <br />this situation from happening again. Ms. Beekman replied that there is a process <br />for applying for a pool. The appiicant would come in fbr a Building P�rmit, <br />would include a survey, along with ihe application, and would verify that ihe <br />property lines are based an that survey. Ms Beekxnan stated that th� cost af <br />getting a Certificate of Survey could be high, so they would allow a Site Plan, <br />whic� is a Non-Certified Survey. If, when the City inspects, the measurements <br />r�vere close, th� appiicant would then be required to have a Certi�Zed Survey done. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.