My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1.D Assessment Policy
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
4-20-09-WS
>
1.D Assessment Policy
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2011 10:42:57 AM
Creation date
2/15/2011 10:42:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
4-20-09 Council Worksession
General - Type
4-20-09 Council Worksession
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />MEMORANDUM <br />DATE: AgendaItem 1.D <br /> April 20, 2009 <br />TO: <br /> Mayor and City Council <br />FROM: <br /> Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br /> Sue Iverson, Finance Director <br />SUBJECT: Street Improvement Project Assessment Policy <br />Background <br />The Council has had general discussions regarding the review of the City’s street improvement <br />assessment policy, in light of the current PMP project, and in light of assessment options used in <br />other cities. This memo provides information regarding two assessment options in comparison to <br />the City’s current assessment policy. The current policy and options are as follows: <br />Current policy: Assess 50% of the street improvement costs <br />Option 1: Assess 20% of the street improvement costs* <br />Option 2: Assess 0% of the street improvement costs* <br />*For Options 1 and 2, the reduction in the amount of assessment revenue would be offset by an <br />increase in the amount of tax levy revenue. <br />Evaluation of Options <br />Tax Levy Impact <br />The key impact of the assessment policy options is the increase in the tax levy required to fund <br />the street improvement projects. The attached charts show the impact of options 1 and 2 in <br />relation to the 2009 PMP project, and in relation to the PMP projects proposed in the 5 year <br />Capital improvement Plan (CIP). While the chart related to the 2009 PMP project <br />shows the need for a $353,000 tax levy increase to offset the reduced assessment revenue, the 5 <br />year chart shows the need for a $ 233,000 tax levy increase, due to the plan not including a <br />large street improvement project in every year. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.