Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MEMORANDUM <br />DATE: AgendaItem 1.D <br /> April 20, 2009 <br />TO: <br /> Mayor and City Council <br />FROM: <br /> Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br /> Sue Iverson, Finance Director <br />SUBJECT: Street Improvement Project Assessment Policy <br />Background <br />The Council has had general discussions regarding the review of the City’s street improvement <br />assessment policy, in light of the current PMP project, and in light of assessment options used in <br />other cities. This memo provides information regarding two assessment options in comparison to <br />the City’s current assessment policy. The current policy and options are as follows: <br />Current policy: Assess 50% of the street improvement costs <br />Option 1: Assess 20% of the street improvement costs* <br />Option 2: Assess 0% of the street improvement costs* <br />*For Options 1 and 2, the reduction in the amount of assessment revenue would be offset by an <br />increase in the amount of tax levy revenue. <br />Evaluation of Options <br />Tax Levy Impact <br />The key impact of the assessment policy options is the increase in the tax levy required to fund <br />the street improvement projects. The attached charts show the impact of options 1 and 2 in <br />relation to the 2009 PMP project, and in relation to the PMP projects proposed in the 5 year <br />Capital improvement Plan (CIP). While the chart related to the 2009 PMP project <br />shows the need for a $353,000 tax levy increase to offset the reduced assessment revenue, the 5 <br />year chart shows the need for a $ 233,000 tax levy increase, due to the plan not including a <br />large street improvement project in every year. <br /> <br />