05-16-11-WS - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — MAY 16, 2011 8 Mr. Webb stated that at their St. Louis store the window graphics contain historical representations of that area. He added that CVS does not put sale signs or advertising in their windows. He stated that in some stores they use local artists to do the window graphics. Councilmember Holden expressed concern over the view of the west side of the building where all that would be visible is a big brick wall. She asked if the developer could add fake windows or something that would make that view a little more appealing. Mr. Trooien responded that they do plan to have landscaping along that side of the building. Mr. Keely added that the CVS building will be sitting low and that Building 2 will cover two - thirds of that view. The most visible part of the CVS building, he explained. will be the southwest corner. Mr. Wellington stated they will work to improve that view and added that what is before the Council this evening is not the final design. He stated their objective is to have all four sides of the building look attractive. City Administrator Klaers questioned the plans for Building 4. Mr. Wellington responded that they have a number of thoughts for Building 4, but they're a little "caught" because of previous direction from the Council and concern over the increase in traffic. They would like to be able to market Building 4 but have been hesitant because of the previous direction from the Council. Ms. Beekman added that at the original Council review, the use on the north side was a complete unknown and that has now become clearer. Mr. Klaers asked if there are plans to upgrade or improve the appearance of the existing building to blend in better with the new buildings being proposed. Mr. Wellington responded that there are two ways to go; they have considered tearing down part of the existing structures and put a new user in, or just fix it up and make it looked cared for. Again, he referred to the direction they originally received from the Council which was to "spruce up" the buildings but not commit to a complete redevelopment. Mayor Grant asked if the developer had considered a rear traffic exit from this development onto Pine Tree. Mr. Wellington agreed that would be a good idea, however, the property owner won't even discuss the possibility. They believe the two access points they are proposing will be adequate. He added that Frattalone's is very happy with their location and are considering expansion. In answer to Mr. Klaers' question, he explained that the most likely choice will be to work with the existing tenants to make those buildings look a little more like the new buildings being proposed. Councilmember Holden asked if this request is to amend the PUD.