05-16-11-WS - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — MAY 16, 2011 9 Ms. Beekman responded that this is an amendment to the Master PLED. Councilmember Tamble commented that the proposed monument on the corner appears to be behind the Arden Hills sign. Mr. Wellington responded that there is some flexibility and they are willing to work with the City for the best solution. Councilmember Holden asked for more detail on the bell tower shown on the drawings for the CVS building. Mr. Webb explained that it is for aesthetics only. Mayor Grant stated he is fine with the plan presented this evening; that he has no concerns or objections. He added that he likes the aesthetics of the design. Councilmember Tamble stated he welcomes the redevelopment of this property. Councilmember Holden commented that she wants to be sure that there is real brick used on the exterior of the new buildings. Councilmember Holmes questioned the statement that the site lay -out does not meet minimum setback requirements. Ms. Beekman explained that the CVS building and Building 2 do not meet the front setback requirement but this proposal is the same as originally approved. Councilmember Holmes also questioned the statement that the proposal does not meet the City's glass requirements. Ms. Beekman responded that those details will be addressed in the next step of this development process. Councilmember Holmes questioned if the reduced square footage of this proposal has resulted in more landscaping or more parking. Mr. Keely responded there is more landscaping and more parking than in the original proposal. Councilmember Holden stated another concern is the relationship with Arden Pharmacy related to this proposal. Mr. Wellington responded that they continue to have good relations with Arden Pharmacy. Mayor Grant suggested that the petitioner present a letter from Arden Pharmacy stating their agreement with this proposal.