My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-01-11-S
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
06-01-11-S
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2012 3:30:55 PM
Creation date
6/28/2011 3:42:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
Special Meeting Minutes
General - Type
Special Meeting Minutes
Category
Special Meeting Minutes
Date
6/1/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — June 1, 2011 17 <br />8.B. Authorize Hiring Project Inspector (continued) <br />Councilmember Holmes asked for clarification on why this person was needed for the PMP <br />project and how it was being funded. <br />Public Works Director Maurer stated Roseville staff usually provides all of the construction <br />inspection for the PMP projects but does not have the capacity to do this for the 2011 PMP <br />project. The 2011 PMP and the Fox Ridge development are close together and a single person <br />could oversee both projects and be the City's point of contact for residents with questions or <br />concerns. Because the construction inspector would be used on different projects, each project <br />will need to fund the services that are used. Pulte Group will pay for the time spent at the Fox <br />Ridge development, and the time spent on the PMP project will be partially funded by the <br />overhead costs that were included in the project, and the remainder will be paid for using the PIR <br />fund. The two projects are close together so a single person could be used for both projects since <br />neither project requires a full time person. <br />Mayor Grant suggested the person report to Public Works Director Maurer in regards to the Fox <br />Ridge development. The City will need someone with this depth of experience for the Fox Ridge <br />development and this will be a wise investment for the City <br />The motion was called to a vote. <br />The motion carried unanimously (5 -0). <br />9. COUNCIL COMMENTS & STAFF UPDATES <br />Councilmember Tamble stated the sound wall decision was difficult but was he felt the City had <br />made the right one based on the information that was available. He also stated that the <br />presentation provided by Councilmember Holden was good for educating the public on the <br />TCAAP property and the previous development proposal by Ryan versus the potential stadium <br />development proposal. <br />Councilmember Werner stated next week Thursday and Friday is the Valentine Hills garage <br />sale. He also stated that as far as the legislature is concerned there would be a meeting on Friday <br />between leaders. <br />Councilmember Holmes stated the Planning Commission still has two vacancies and they have <br />only received one application at this time. <br />Councilmember Holmes stated she has been getting comments from residents regarding the <br />article in the Arden Hills Notes on rental properties. The comments have been helpful and she <br />encouraged residents to continue commenting. <br />Mayor Grant stated the presentation by Councilmember Holden was good and put the Ryan <br />development proposal into perspective. The Ryan development was not going to be a typical <br />Arden Hills development with large areas of green space, but more a high-density residential area <br />with small lots and a lot of commercial buildings with surface parking lots. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.