Laserfiche WebLink
Internal Circulation <br />Aside from the one-way flow at the pick-up/drop-off drive, the other internal roadways will allow two- <br />way traffic flow. Because the conceptual parcel has no direct access onto either Lexington Avenue or <br />County Road E, cross access between the two parcels must be provided. The westerly drive extends to a <br />parking area at the rear of the senior center parcel, and then turns easterly to access the parking area for <br />the conceptual parcel. The parking area for the conceptual parcel also can be accessed via the easterly <br />driveway onto County Road E. <br />To model the distribution of the traffic generated by the senior center and various uses considered for the <br />conceptual parcel, RLK looked at the trip distribution of the highest generating use being considered. <br />Also, RLK had to determine the directional split of the traffic. For the senior center, it was assumed that <br />45% would use the easterly driveway, 45% would use the westerly driveway and 10% would use the <br />pick-up/drop-off driveway. For the conceptual parcel, RLK assumed 80% would use the easterly <br />driveway and 20% of the traffic would use the westerly driveway. <br />Based on the trip generation calculations found in Table 2, RLK determined the heaviest trip generator for <br />each time frame as the worst case scenario to be tested. The A.M. Peak Hour trip generation is heaviest <br />with a fast-food restaurant with drive-thru on the conceptual parcel. The P.M. Peak Hour trip generation <br />would be heaviest with a pharmacy with a drive-thru on the concept parcel. In this case, the trip <br />generation for the P.M. Peak Hour exceeds that for the A.M. Peak Hour, thus the P.M. Peak Hour was <br />considered the critical Build Condition for analysis. <br />By applying the site trip distribution to the Existing P.M. Peak Hour traffic, as found in the Spack report, <br />RLK was able to model the Build condition in the P.M. Peak Hour scenario. Levels of service were no <br />worse than LOS-C for any of the study intersections. <br />Delay and stacking distance did not appear to be significant at any of the driveways during the PM Peak <br />th <br />Hour. SimTraffic analyses showed a 95 Percentile Queue length of 67 feet (2-3 car lengths) at the <br />easterly driveway, and the model showed the queue cleared rapidly as traffic entered County Road E. <br />Alternate Pick-Up/Drop-Off Access <br />RLK reviewed the possibility of reversing the direction of the pick-up/drop-off drive between the Eastern <br />Driveway and the Central Driveway. Instead of an eastbound movement, RLK tested the operation of the <br />driveway as a westbound only movement. <br />While such an alignment does create a situation where northbound to westbound movements into the <br />pick-up/drop-off driveway may be blocked by southbound traffic, there are so few vehicles attempting to <br />make this movement (e.g., one or two senior center vans or occasional visitors per peak hour, etc.) that <br />the chance of intersection gridlock is quite small. <br />From a traffic engineering perspective, the City’s proposed alignment with the eastbound one-way flow <br />of the pick-up/drop-off drive is conceptually better, but a westbound drive is unlikely to be an operational <br />concern. <br />Conclusion <br />RLK has tested several scenarios of trip generation and traffic operation for the Select Senior Living site <br />and the conceptual parcel to the east. It is out conclusion that the trip generation and traffic operation <br />associated with these potential uses will operate the same, if not better than the previous use on the site <br /> Page 6 of 7 June 6, 2011 <br />RLK Incorporated <br />Co. Rd. E & Lexington Traffic Study 2011-052-M <br /> <br />