My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2B, US 10 - Highway 96 Interchange Improvements - Municipal Co
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
09-19-11-WS
>
2B, US 10 - Highway 96 Interchange Improvements - Municipal Co
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/23/2024 12:19:57 AM
Creation date
9/16/2011 4:10:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
City Council Work Session Sept 19, 2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EN HILLS <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> DATE: September 19,2011 <br /> TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers <br /> Patrick Klaers, City Administrator 1 <br /> FROM: Terry Maurer, Public Works Director <br /> SUBJECT: US 10/11wy 96 Interchange Improvements <br /> Municipal Consent <br /> Background <br /> At the April 25, 2011 work session representatives of Ramsey County presented and <br /> discussed the proposed US 10/Highway 96 grade separation project. Since the proposed <br /> project alters access, it does require Municipal Consent from the City. <br /> The City Council held the required Public Hearing for Municipal Consent on July 11, <br /> 2011. According to the Municipal Consent process the City has 90 days from the Public <br /> Hearing to take action to approve, deny, or disapprove with conditions. The last City <br /> Council meeting within this 90-day window will be the September 26, 2011 regular <br /> meeting. If the City Council takes no action, Municipal Consent is considered granted. <br /> The City Council discussed the Municipal Consent action at the August 15. 2011 work <br /> session but gave no direction as representatives of Ramsey County attending the work <br /> session indicated they would take a closer look at traffic counts relative to movement loss <br /> in both the I-694 project and the proposed 10/96 project. They have completed further <br /> analysis and attached is a small report on their findings. Representatives from Ramsey <br /> County will again be present at the work session to discuss these findings. <br /> If the City Council is considering a Resolution disapproving the final layout with <br /> conditions required for approval there seems to be three main issues. These are: <br /> 1. The northbound US 10 access to eastbound Hwy 96. <br /> City Council Meeting <br /> CAUserslterry.maurer\Desktopl9-19-1 1 Hwy 10-96.doc <br /> Page 1 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.