Laserfiche WebLink
of the related nature of site remediation responsibilities and land-use <br />controls that restrict the use of the land. It is estimated that land <br />acquisition and site demolition and remediation costs could range <br />from $23 million to $70 million. The wide cost range is due primarily <br />to uncertainty regarding the existing contamination, the development <br />plan and the land appraisal. These uncertainties should be better <br />understood in order to negotiate the land sale price with the GSA. In <br />addition to completing an additional environmental site assessment, <br />the County should have a plan in place for indemnification against <br />the uncertainty of the site remediation costs. <br />Ramsey County has found that remediation. stop-loss/cleanup cost <br />cap insurance is not available in today's market, which means there <br />may be no risk mitigation available in the insurance industry to ad- <br />dress the primary risk of remediation cost overruns. The potential <br />risk for increases in site remediation costs could be mitigated through <br />the use of a fixed-price remediation contract, which, if available at a <br />cost within project resources, passes the risk of cost overruns to the <br />remediation contractor. <br />Ramsey County and the Vikings have proposed early 2012 for the <br />start of environmental remediation., but site remediation. cannot begin <br />until the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) approves an <br />action plan for remediation. Producing such a plan and obtaining <br />MPCA. approval could delay the start of site remediation by three to) <br />eight months. <br />Thereafter, the time required to complete site rem .. edial:ion. depends on <br />steps that MPCA needs to confirm. MPCA has indicated that a year <br />to complete site remediation appears to be unrealistic considering the <br />many factors that. are difficult to predict. A,. year m.ay be sufficient, but <br />the project may incur increased costs to meet that sched.ule. <br />Ultimately, site remediation may take longer than proposed, posing a <br />risk to the development schedule. While the risk to the schedule is <br />significant, mitigation measures are limited. The primary mitigation <br />action would be to accelerate the review process and begin obtaining <br />as much soil information on the site as possible. <br />Environmental Review and Documentation Process <br />Federal and state laws requiring environmental analysis apply to the <br />Stadium Proposal. The federal environmental review would be limited <br />to the transportation improvements proposed for the Interstate <br />highway system. The risk stemming from the federal process is that <br />the environmental analysis could reveal the need for other <br />improvements to the Interstate system not currently identified. <br />The state environmental review would cover all environmental effects <br />Land transactions like <br />this one are un.comrrion <br />and complex. it is <br />difficult to estimate <br />remedial ienup Costs <br />arid schedule at this time <br />A strategy for limiting <br />potential site remediation <br />cost overruns should be <br />developed. <br />NTPC,',A has indicated ti a' <br />a year to cornpleLe site <br />remcdiatiofl appears to <br />be unrealistic considering <br />I he Ilia factors that are <br />to rwedici. <br />