Laserfiche WebLink
'The 3tdturri Proposal <br />includes a :[..)arkage of 13 <br />Ira n sp or a lion pal er t s <br />at a total net osi of <br />-1.07 ruillion <br />related to transportation improvements for state and federal facilities <br />and the overall site development. For the state process, the <br />transportation requirements of the future development could differ <br />from those of the Stadium Proposal as currently defined, posing a <br />risk to both cost and schedule of the project. <br />The federal and state processes pose differing risks depending on <br />whether the entire parcel is evaluated or just the Stadium Parcel. The <br />environmental review process on only the 260-acre Stadium Parcel <br />preferred by Ramsey County and the Vikings could be allowable, but <br />has a potential risk for legal challenge because it does not include the <br />arguably connected action of the future 170-acre development. <br />Transportation <br />Significant levels of traffic will be generated by a new stadium at the <br />TCAAP site. To accommodate the traffic, the Stadium Proposal <br />includes a package of 13 transportation projects at a total net cost of <br />$101 million. Three bridge-related projects, totaling a projected $20 <br />million, were previously programmed and funded by MnDOT for the <br />area as part of its normal transportation funded improvements <br />program. <br />The regional travel-demand model shows that traffic congestion with <br />the stadium and 13 transportation improvements would be negligibly <br />worse than otherwise forecast for 2030 with the already programmed <br />$20 million transportation improvements. However, there is still a <br />risk of increased congestion at some intersections and roads within <br />the stadiu.m area, which could, in turn, cause delays on some parts of <br />the regional highway network. <br />Localized congestion may have a cascading effect on some <br />segments of regional highway network, depending on the <br />nature of the congestion. A more detailed peak-travel analysis for the <br />stadium's major entrance and exit locations, as part of the <br />environmental review process, would help in refining a response <br />strategy for potential localized congestion. Traffic-behavior <br />information could be collected during the first few major events and <br />used to refine traffic management. <br />Rights-of-way or temporary construction easements are anticipated <br />on some of the Stadium Proposal transportation improvements and <br />possibly for stormwater management. Right-of-v ,ay needs have not <br />yet been specifically identified or costs estimated for individual <br />projects. Mitigation measures can add substantial costs to a project, <br />but those measures will not be known until the environmental review <br />process is complete. As a result, the costs cannot be determined at <br />