10-19-11 EDC Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

this time. An additional risk is that the final design of a project may differ sign from the current concept, requiring different or additional measures. A range of $91 million to $111 million, providing for plus or minus 10 percent., should adequately address the uncertainties around surface transportation improvements needed for the Stadium Parcel. Access from County Road I to the stadium for game-day events is a critical transportation need for the Stadium Proposal. Lack of this access will result in unacceptable congestion on the regional and lo- cal roads. Agreement must he reached by the National Guard and all Wildlife Corridor stakeholders on an acceptable design and alignment and operations responsibilities for a stadium access road connecting to County Road I. Until this agreement is reached, the project cannot. be defined for purposes of environmental review. Delay in the envi- ronmental review process can be mitigated by including environmen- tal advocacy groups early in the process. Permitting and Approvals The greatest risk associated with obtaining federal and state approvals is the impact on the project schedule. Federal approvals would involve the Army Corps of Engineers, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Departm.ent of interior, and the Federal Highway Administration. State approvals and permits would be required from the MPCA and the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT). These federal and state approvals are not typically regarded as high-risk processes. The highest-risk approval could be approval of the federal Environ.m.ental Assessment. because it potentially involves the longest time frame. Coordination with the permitting and approving agencies will be important to minimizing the risk in delays to the overall schedule. State legislation could include measures to streamline permit reviews, but this would affect only state permits, not the federal reviews. Among the regional approvals, a metropolitan significance review, if conducted, poses a major schedule risk to the project. Once a metropolitan significance review commen.ces, the process could delay the project schedule by u.p to 12 months. However, the Legislature could take action to exempt this project from metropolitan significance review. The Stadium Proposal would re . quire a number of local permits and approvals from several municipalities, the Rice Creek Watershed Distric,t. and Ramsey County. Presenting the most risk. is obtaining .'(!ess from Roa- I to the sLadiurn for irrie-day (Nents is a (Tit ica tTaiispori. ation need for. the Stadium Proposal,, Coorclination with the permitting and approving :igeri.cies ‘vill be important to nlinimizing the risk in delays to the overall ..:::c.neciule„ State legislation could include Ineasure:: to s.i.reaniline reviews hilt this would affect onl:y state perrnits, not •the federal reviews,