My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-20-12 PTRC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee (PTRC)
>
PTRC Packets (2010 to Present)
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
03-20-12 PTRC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2024 7:02:49 AM
Creation date
3/16/2012 9:55:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
3-20-12 PTRC Packet
General - Type
3-20-12 PTRC Packet
Category
3-20-12 PTRC Packet
Date
3/20/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Parks,Trails&Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes January 10,2012 <br /> Page 2 <br /> creating the article and would like to put this together at some point after their joint meeting. <br /> She indicated she was very impressed with everyone's articles. Ms. Olson stated that she <br /> added reviewing the need for bike racks in the park system as#3 under the 2012 goals and the <br /> need for an off leash dog area as#4 under the 2012 goals. Committee Member Peck suggested <br /> adding a goal about promoting a trail corridor from Hwy 51 to County Road 96 with the <br /> primary current focus being on County Road 51 to E and having this be in conjunction with the <br /> City's street rehabilitation project. He felt this segment should be the committee's highest <br /> priority since it is a dangerous road. Adding stop signs and reducing the speed limit on this <br /> corridor were also discussed but Ms. Olson indicated they would then need to work with the <br /> Ramsey County since it is a County road. Ms. Olson indicated she could check with the Public <br /> Works Director to see who they could advise of the PTRC's concerns about road safety. <br /> C. Trail Signage Discussion <br /> Ms. Olson indicated she has been talking with two companies for the signage. The sign <br /> companies do not have the same file formatting that the mapping person has,which will need <br /> to be worked out. She indicated she will wait to see if Council likes the overall concept before <br /> thinking further about which company to use and how to set up the mapping files. <br /> Ms. Olson asked that the committee identify what kind of sign they would like, how many <br /> signs they anticipate, what will be on the sign, and a ballpark idea of where to place the signs <br /> so they can present this information at the joint meeting. <br /> Committee Member Michaelson presented his concept on what material to use and how to <br /> construct the sign stands/frames. He indicated the construction would come to approximately <br /> $53 per sign and that assembly and maintenance of the stands could be a project for the Eagle <br /> Scouts. Committee Member Kramlinger suggested they modify this design to just a single <br /> post. The committee was also in favor of using a cedar post and having the Arden Hills logo <br /> included on the map. It was the consensus of the committee that they liked the 12 x 18 size <br /> maps and that the painted steel signs would be better than aluminum signs. The committee <br /> also decided that approximately 20-25 signs were needed and that they would provide the <br /> Council a couple examples of where they felt signs were needed, like on Stowe Avenue. <br /> Committee Member Peck asked if they could possibly get a prototype of the sign before the <br /> meeting and also a post. Committee Member Kramlinger stated that he could try to bring a <br /> sample. <br /> D. Other Unfinished Business <br /> None <br /> 4. NEW BUSINESS <br /> A. February 21, 2012 Joint Meeting Presentation <br /> Ms. Olson mentioned that she included slides from last year's work session and feels they can <br /> follow the same format by first stating the PTRC's purpose and mission and then following <br /> with the 2012 goals, getting comments and suggestions on each goal, and seeing whether <br /> Council supports the goal. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.