Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—April 25, 2011 11 <br /> 7.A. Planning Case 11-006 for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment Adding Very Low Density <br /> Residential as a Land Use Classification in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and Re-guiding the Property at 4500 Snelling Avenue North as Very Low Density Residential (continued) <br /> City Planner Beekman stated the applicant has a purchase agreement for 25.4 acres of <br /> undeveloped land on the southeast corner of Highway 96 and Snelling Avenue N. The property is <br /> zoned Rl, single-family residential, and is guided for Low Density Residential in the City's 2030 <br /> Comprehensive Plan. The applicant is requesting approval to subdivide the property to allow for <br /> single-family homes. Through early discussions with the developer it became clear that there is a <br /> conflict between the City's Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan in regards to the required <br /> density of R-1 property in the City. The City's 2030 Comprehensive Plan guides the future land <br /> use of the property as Low Density Residential, which is defined as residential property developed <br /> at three to five units per net acre. In contrast, the City's Zoning Code caps the allowed density in <br /> the R-1 District at three units per net acre. Furthermore, the Code requires a minimum. of 14,000 <br /> square feet per R-1 lot, which does not allow for a density of three units per net acre. If the <br /> applicant develops the property in accordance with the City's Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances, <br /> they would need a Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) to allow less than three units per acre. <br /> In contrast, if the property were developed in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan <br /> requirements at a higher density, flexibility from the City's Zoning Code would be necessary. At the January 31, 2011,work session with the City Council, Pulte Group presented two concept plan <br /> scenarios; one at a higher density option that met the requirements of the Comprehensive Plan,and a second lower density option that met the requirements of the Zoning Code. The City <br /> Council gave direction that the lower density option was preferred, and Pulte Group has since _ <br /> moved forward with preparing a development application package in line with this direction. If <br /> the City approves the CPA, it will be contingent on approval from the Metropolitan Council. <br /> Councilmember Holden asked if the Met Council required a density of 3 units per acre or higher. <br /> City Planner Beekman stated the Met Council prefers a minimum density of 3 or more units per <br /> acre for new development. They want the City to have an average density of 3 units per acre and <br /> the City does meet this even with the proposed Fox Ridge development. <br /> Councilmember Holden stated she would like to be sure that if Pulte decides to pull out of the <br /> project the amendment is still approved because the City needs to rectify the difference in the City <br /> Code and the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. <br /> City Planner Beekman stated the motion being presented at this time was to approve the <br /> Comprehensive Plan Amendment and to reclassify the property as Very Low Density Residential. <br /> Even if Pulte Group decides not to do this project it is necessary to bring the Comp Plan and <br /> Zoning Code in line. By amending the Comprehensive Plan the City is eliminating discrepancies <br /> presented by the City's Zoning Code and the 2030 Comprehensive PIan regarding the density for <br /> the R-1 District. <br /> Councilmember Holmes asked if all of the R-1 District would need to be reclassified as Very <br /> Low Density Residential or if there would be two R-I Districts now. <br />