Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—April 25, 2011 7 <br /> S.D. Approval for Additional Expenditures for Hill Capital Strategies, Inc. (continued) <br /> City Administrator Klaers stated that he had faith in Ramsey County but felt the relationship <br /> with Mr. Hill would be beneficial to the City's interests in the future. <br /> Councilmember Holmes stated the disadvantage of not continuing to work with Mr. Hill is if the <br /> discussions progress on the stadium the City will have no one there. <br /> Councilmember Tamble asked where the impact of having someone to represent the City was <br /> and what would Mr. Hill be doing for the City that the City could not do for itself. <br /> City Administrator Klaers stated Mr. Hill is well connected and would have access to <br /> relationships that may be beneficial that the City does not have. The City would also not have <br /> access to any information before it is public knowledge. <br /> Councilmember Holden stated she would like to see the City have a person on the Sports <br /> Commission once that is established to ensure the City has representation and Mr. Hill may be <br /> able to make this happen for the City. <br /> Mayor Grant stated he would like to see more results from Mr. Hill. He also stated he <br /> understood there was not a lot to report since there was not a lot of activity at this time. He clarified that at this time their relationship with Mr. Hill is more of an insurance policy and the <br /> City does not want to be caught in a situation that it is not prepared for. <br /> MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Homes seconded a <br /> motion to Approve up to an additional $5 000 in Expenditures for Contract <br /> Costs with Hill Capital Strategies, Inc. For a Total Contract Cost Not To <br /> Exceed $13 200. The motion carried 4-1• Councilmember Tamble . <br /> 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS <br /> A. 2011 PMP Special Assessment Hearing, Resolution 2011-021 and Resolution <br /> 2011-022 <br /> Civil Engineer Giga stated on January 31, 2011, the City Council approved the plans and <br /> specifications for the 2011 Pavement Management Program (PMP) and ordered advertisement for <br /> bids. Bids were opened on Tuesday, March 8, 2011. A portion of the costs for the 2011 PMP <br /> project are proposed to be assessed to the benefiting properties. In order to assess these costs the <br /> City must follow the Public Hearing steps outlined in State Statute 429. On March 14, 2011, the <br /> City Council set April 25, 2011, as the date to hold the public hearing for the purpose of <br /> establishing special assessments for the 2011 PMP Improvements. Following the assessment <br /> hearing, the next step in the process is to adopt the assessment roll. The assessment roll may be <br /> adopted as proposed, or with amendments as made by the City Council. If the Council adopts the <br /> assessment roll and chooses to move forward with the project, action to award the bid is needed. <br /> The low bid submitted by Asphalt Surface Technologies Corporation (Astech Corporation) is 16% <br /> lower than the Engineer's construction estimate. Staff recommends moving forward with the <br /> project. The project is proposed to be assessed consistent with the City's assessment policy <br />