Laserfiche WebLink
Study had p.m. peak hour traffic for the specialty retail of 80 trips based on a day care <br />facility and a fitness club. The Addendum changes those uses to a bike shop and an <br />insurance office and reduces the p.m. peak hour trips from 80 to 35, a 56% reduction. <br />Similarly, the Traffic Study predicted p.m. peak hour trip generation from Lot 2 at 166 <br />based on a pharmacy w/drive-thru and the Addendum reduces that number of p.m. peak <br />hour trips to 36 based on a 24,000 square foot office. This is a 78% reduction from the <br />Traffic Study. <br />The Addendum goes on to compare the reduced p.m. peak hour trips from the proposed <br />redevelopment of the site to the 2008 Spack Consulting Traffic Impact Study that was <br />prepared as part of the Guiding Plan for the B2 District. The Spack Traffic Impact Study <br />estimated a total of 1,960 daily trips and 239 p.m. peak hour trips based on <br />redevelopment of the Holiday Inn/McGuire's site into 95 apartment units and 120,000 <br />square feet of office. The Addendum suggests that based on their development scenario <br />for the site it will only generate 1,818 total daily trips with 145 p.m. peak hour trips. <br />The Addendum states, "the current development plan results in less daily and p.m. <br />peak hour trip generation than anticipated in the Guiding Plan for the B2 District." <br />This is true if the site develops exactly as is indicated in the Addendum. I believe that <br />there is an equally good chance that at full build-out it will generate as much or more <br />p.m. peak hour trips as the Spack Traffic Impact Study estimated from the site. Because <br />the Addendum is totally silent on other findings of the Spack Traffic Impact Study it <br />tends to imply that as long as the development generates less traffic than anticipated in <br />the Spack Study everything will be fine. This really is not the whole story. <br />The Spack Study looked at the redevelopment of the Holiday Inn/McGuire's site <br />assuming the existing building would be razed and the redevelopment would start with an <br />empty lot. This would allow driveways to be positioned in the places where they would <br />function best given the anticipated traffic. Even with this assumption the Executive <br />SLul�mary of the Spack Study says the following: <br />The driveways on County Road E for the Holiday Inn site and the Arden <br />Plaza site will experience significant delay and queuing in the p.m. peak <br />hour. This is acceptable as an interim situation because it is not expected <br />to pose a safety problem, little queuing is anticipated on County Road E. <br />Long term, the queuing will impact the vitality of the redevelopments and <br />could lead to safety problems. These driveways should be realigned <br />midway between Pine Tree Drive and Lexington Avenue to provide a <br />four legged intersection that could be controlled with a traffic signal. <br />Left turn lanes and shared through/right lanes should be provided on the <br />north and south legs to provide adequate egress. <br />2 of 3 <br />