My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7A, 2013 Pavement Management Program - Public Hearing Ridgewood, Asbury, Edgewater, and Glenhill Neighborhood
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
01-14-13-R
>
7A, 2013 Pavement Management Program - Public Hearing Ridgewood, Asbury, Edgewater, and Glenhill Neighborhood
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2013 11:11:57 AM
Creation date
1/9/2013 11:11:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Glen Hill Road <br /> The widths of all of our streets vary from 25-36'. Instead of these varying widths, I would like to suggest <br /> building streets in the neighborhood at 24' wide, a width that would more appropriately handle our <br /> neighborhood's lower volume of traffic. By constructing streets to this narrower width the remaining space can <br /> then be used for rain gardens. For example Glen Hill Avenue from Asbury to Ridgewood Road is 30' wide; <br /> making this section a 24' roadway would provide six feet that could be used for rainwater storage(not counting <br /> the residential boulevard for each home). This also would reduce the amount of impervious surface that would <br /> need to be managed. <br /> Asbury Avenue <br /> Asbury Avenue from Glen Hill to Edgewater serves as a route for at most 10 houses. The width of this section <br /> of Asbury is 30'. The feasibility report designates the Northwestern College side of the road as a rain garden. <br /> However much of that side has a steep slope with many shrubs growing on it, and since Northwestern College <br /> has a busy road on the other side of the fence, this shrub border acts as a much needed buffer to the sound <br /> coming from that road as well as to its view, and the view of the many buildings and college layout that so <br /> significantly contrasts with our neighborhood. This sloping section of boulevard would be unsuitable to water <br /> storage. The only way to create enough area flat enough to hold water would be to do significant clearing and <br /> grubbing. A retaining wall, should it be needed, would be expensive to build and maintain. <br /> By narrowing the street 6' much of the converted road bed could be easily used as a rain garden. I've attached <br /> two pictures facing north and south on Asbury in front of my house taken this weekend, showing that the <br /> normal road traffic doesn't now use the whole width of the road. Notice the snow and leaves stuck to the road <br /> on the College sideāthe space between the leaves was created by rivulet's of water flowing through the leaves <br /> during a fall rain storm, not by tire tracks. By making the new road 24' wide we would have a road as wide as <br /> we are effectively using now that would cost less to build, and would reduce the neighborhood's need for water <br /> storage. <br /> Ridgewood <br /> The road section to the beach property serves only two homes and would not need to be redone to its current <br /> width of between 29 and 33'. If it were narrowed to 24' there would be space for a rain garden along the <br /> wetland side that would require less clearing and grubbing. <br /> Edgewater Avenue <br /> Edgewater is currently 25' and would benefit from a slightly narrower street. <br /> Overall then, my view is that a 24' wide road would be appropriate and adequate for our neighborhood <br /> usage, would provide several areas alongside the road that could be used for rainwater storage, and also reduce <br /> our construction costs. <br /> Thanks for your consideration, <br /> Nancy Jacobson <br /> 3188 Asbury Ave <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.