My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1B, Multi-Family Dwelling Regulations Discussion
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
01-22-13-WS
>
1B, Multi-Family Dwelling Regulations Discussion
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2013 11:21:23 AM
Creation date
1/18/2013 11:21:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION—JULY 11, 2012 4 <br /> Chair Larson agreed and recommended staff speaks with Steve Baker regarding this <br /> matter. <br /> Commissioner Hames stated the need for rental housing was on the rise and she <br /> encouraged the Commission to keep this in mind as the City would have requests for new <br /> multi-family dwellings in the near future. <br /> City Planner Beekman stated another option would be to create a PUD process for the <br /> redevelopment of a multi-family dwelling. <br /> Chair Larson indicated this would eliminate the need to dictate all guidelines in that each <br /> redevelopment could be reviewed on a case by case basis. <br /> Commissioner Holewa was in favor of this as well. <br /> City Planner Beekman stated the City did have limited rental housing opportunities <br /> available. She indicated the City would benefit from a variety of unit sizes to meet <br /> market demands. She stated that generally speaking, it's good to avoid large <br /> demographic blocks, as this cuts down on a communities ability to weather shifts in the <br /> market and provide life cycle housing for its residents. <br /> Commissioner Stodola was in favor of setting an average unit size within multi-family <br /> dwellings as this would encourage a more diverse rental population. In addition, she <br /> suggested a maximum number of units in a complex also be set. <br /> Commissioner Haines agreed stating a maximum number or percentage of efficiency <br /> units should also be set. She then discussed the properties in the City that could be used <br /> for future multi-family development. <br /> City Planner Beekman stated the building code does regulate windows and allows them <br /> to overlook a courtyard. However, City Code does not define a courtyard. She reported <br /> that Holiday Inn was proposing several units overlooking a basketball court. <br /> Chair Larson reviewed some discussions the City of St. Paul was having at this time <br /> regarding egress windows. He noted the building code did cover much of these concerns. <br /> He stated a glazed opening was required within the code. <br /> City Planner Beekman then requested further information on the parking requirements for <br /> multi-family dwellings. <br /> Chair Larson recommended one stall per bedroom be set as a standard. He did not want <br /> to see large parking lots built. He was in favor of new construction having structured <br /> parking below the buildings. This was a nice upgrade that offered heated parking. He <br /> was not in favor of detached garages. <br /> Commissioner Holewa suggested visitor parking be delineated from resident parking. <br /> Community Development Intern Horton stated all cities he spoke with require one <br /> enclosed parking space per dwelling. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.