Laserfiche WebLink
ill <br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—NOVEMBER 19, 2012 3 <br /> Community Development Director Hutmacher indicated that the cost of moving wells and <br /> related water lines was included in the remediation credit negotiated with the GSA. The U.S. <br /> Army will remain responsible for the operation of the ground water clean-up system. <br /> Councilmember Holmes suggested the word "addressing" be changed to "resolving" when <br /> addressing the remediation concerns in Section 1. She expressed concern with how the site would <br /> be properly remediated by the County. <br /> Mr. Norton indicated Staff would select another word. He commented the point was to have the <br /> County understand the necessity to clean the property to a certain standard based on the proposed <br /> use for the site. However, additional clean up may be required from a future developer. <br /> i <br /> I <br /> Community Development Director Hutmacher further discussed the cleanup levels required for <br /> residential standards and how the County, Army and future developer would be involved. She <br /> then described the VIC program in detail with the Council noting this could be added to the JPA. <br /> Councilmember Holden asked if parcels would be allowed to be developed next to contaminated <br /> areas. <br /> Mr. Norton stated this could conceivably happen and the developer may be forced to install <br /> improvements in this case. <br /> Mayor Grant commented a market study would greatly assist the developers in selling the site, as <br /> this would define which portion should be residential versus retail. <br /> Councilmember Holden requested clarification on the terms new development and public <br /> improvements. <br /> Mr. Norton explained he would work to clarify those terms. <br /> Councilmember Holden noted through the JPA language, the City would be responsible for the <br /> storm water retention ponds. She indicated this would be a large expense in the future. She <br /> recommended if this were to remain that it be added to the City's responsibility section. <br /> City Administrator Klaers recommended this be a developer driven improvement through the <br /> Master Plan process. <br /> Public Works Director Maurer stated there was less expense and liability in maintaining the <br /> storm water ponds than in installing a sanitary sewer system. <br /> Councilmember Holmes commented the City would then be responsible for any proposed water <br /> feature amenity. She encouraged the Council to consider how this would be financed up front and <br /> if bonding would be necessary. <br /> Public Works Director Maurer stated the Master Plan would lay out the surface water <br /> management for the property. <br />