Laserfiche WebLink
Minnesota Sustains Greater Long-term If employment grows faster than the number of workers <br /> Job Growth over a long time, the result will be a tight labor market. <br /> This is already occurring in many parts of Minnesota. <br /> Many rural employers have had difficulty finding work- <br /> Over the last quarter-century,job growth in Minnesota ers for some positions. In the Twin Cities area,the tight <br /> has closely followed national trends. Both state and na- labor market has produced higher wages at the lower end <br /> tional developments have been strongly affected by busi- of the wage scale. <br /> ness cycles, with the rate of job growth falling during <br /> recessions and rising during periods of economic expan- The United States as a whole has experienced a similar <br /> sion.Minnesota's employment growth from 1969 to 1994 but less pronounced trend,with jobs growing faster than <br /> was 72.6 percent,compared to a national average of 58.9 population or employed people. Jobs in Minnesota grew <br /> percent.The greater long-term gain in Minnesota stems twice as fast as population from 1988 to 1994,compared <br /> from relatively strong performance in the 1970s and dur- to 1.3 times as fast in the nation as a whole.Apparently <br /> ing the most recent recession.In the recession of 1990 to Minnesota has been more affected by trends toward <br /> 1992,Minnesota continued to gain jobs,though at a mod- higher labor force participation. <br /> est rate, while the number of jobs dropped nationally. <br /> This contrasts with what happened in the early 1980s <br /> recession, when employment in Minnesota dipped at Service Industry Employment Registers <br /> about the same rate as the national average. <br /> Large Gain <br /> Jobs in Minnesota have been increasing_faster than the <br /> total population and the number of employed people.Be- Service industry groups accounted for almost half of the <br /> tween 1988 and 1994,population grew at an average an- net gain in Minnesota employment from 1988 to 1994, <br /> nual rate of 1.0 percent;the number of employed persons adding almost 162,000 jobs. Service employment also <br /> went up an average of 1.6 percent; and the number of registered the second highest rate of growth—24 per- <br /> jobs rose at a 2.1 percent rate. cent—among major industrial categories. Some of the <br /> service industries contributing to this gain were business <br /> The fact that the number of employed people has grown services,health services,amusement and recreation ser- <br /> faster than the population suggests rising rates of labor vices,and social services.Business services include tem- • <br /> force participation. The more rapid growth of employ- porary help and computer services,both industries that <br /> ment than of employed people possibly reflects more have been thriving since the early 1990s.The temporary <br /> people holding two or more jobs, as well as more people help industry has grown as employers have turned to <br /> commuting from Wisconsin and other border states to consultants and outside labor providers instead of hiring <br /> work in Minnesota. How the BEA measures self-employ- permanent workers.The health care industry has made <br /> ment may be a factor; many of the self-employment jobs a strong showing for many years,with recent growth oc- <br /> picked up by the BEA are probably part-time or casual in curring mainly in settings outside hospitals, such as <br /> nature. home care and clinics. The popularity of gambling casi- <br /> Employment in Most Industries Strong Employment Growth in Midwest <br /> Grew Faster in Minnesota Than in Nation Average Annual Percent Change— 1988 to 1994 <br /> Percent Change—1988 to 1994 <br /> Manufacturing 7% Minnesota 2.1% <br /> Retail ° 2. <br /> g% ° South Dakota ° <br /> 5.6% <br /> Services 24% <br /> 20% North Dakota 70 <br /> . <br /> 4.4% <br /> Farm 7 <br /> Finance,Insurance, 9% Wisconsin 1 2.1% <br /> &Real Estate -1 <br /> All Other 11% Iowa 1.9%0.6% <br /> TOTAL 13% United States ° 1.2 <br /> 8% -0.8/0; <br /> i <br /> ■Minnesota 13 United States ■Total Employment Growth ®Manufacturing Growth <br /> Source:U.S.Bureau of Economic Analysis Source:U.S.Bureau of Economic Analysis <br /> 2 Minnesota Planning June 1996 <br />