3-25-13-R - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Attachment A City Planner Meagan Beekman reviewed the surrounding area, the Plan Evaluation and the Variance Evaluation Criteria. City Planner Meagan Beekman provided the Findings of Fact for review: General Findings 1.The lot depth and width exceed the minimum R-1 requirements. The lot size of 13,939 square feet is nonconforming in the R-1 Zone. 2.The existing structure encroaches nine feet into the 40-foot front yard setback along Skiles Lane. The structure meets all other R-1 setback requirements. 3.The proposed addition would encroach 24 feet into the front yard setback. Approximately 480 square feet of the proposed addition would encroach into the front yard setback, of this 96 square feet would be at-grade and visible from Skiles Lane. The area of the addition outside of the setbacks does not require a variance. The proposed area of the addition would be in line with the existing home, and the portion visible from Skiles Lane would step back with the existing structure. 4.The proposed addition does not encroach on the required setback along Snelling Avenue. 5.The existing and proposed lot coverage meets the R-1 Zone requirements. 6.The existing garage does not meet the ceiling height requirements of the Building Code, thus the proposed garage would bring the property into greater conformance with modern building code requirements. 7.The dwelling with the proposed addition would not exceed the 35 foot height limit. 8.Dwellings and garages are permitted structures within the R-1 Zone. 9.The existing dwelling and the proposed garage are outside of the 100-year flood plain, wetlands, and easements. Variance Findings: 10.The proposal is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the ordinance because it utilizes the topography of the parcel to minimize visual impact from the addition. 11.The proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan because it allows the reasonable use of residential property. 12.A garage and addition are permitted and reasonable uses within the R-1 Zone. 13.The lot is comparably unique in the City. The property is situated on the curve of Skiles Lane as it intersects with Snelling Avenue, thus creating three front yard setback requirements to the south, east and west sides of the lot. 14.The topographic conditions are unique in that there is a significant slope downward from the west to the east which allows the majority of the addition to be built below grade. 15.Since the proposed above grade addition would not encroach any farther into the front yard setback than the existing structure, the addition is unlikely to have a negative impact on the property or the neighborhood. The continued encroachment would have a minimal visual impact from Skiles Lane. 16.The addition would be visible from the rear of the property, which abuts Snelling Avenue; however, the area is heavily wooded and the closest neighbor on this side is over 300 feet away. 17.The proposed plans and setback variance for the dwelling do not appear to be based on economic considerations alone.