My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-13-13-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
05-13-13-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2013 3:02:51 PM
Creation date
5/9/2013 8:52:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—MAY 13, 2013 11 <br /> Lisa Moe, StuartCo, indicated there will not be four-bedroom units within eStreet Flats. <br /> Councilmember Holden recalled that the property will be advertised through technological <br /> means and is surprised that the signs are now being requested. She stated she could support one <br /> banner sign, but does not feel two are necessary. <br /> Councilmember McClung agreed stating he could only support one sign given the size <br /> requested. <br /> Councilmember Holmes stated she does not object to the two signs at their proposed size. It is <br /> her opinion that the two signs are not abusing the sign ordinance and the signs complement the <br /> building nicely. <br /> Mayor Grant indicated that the Council wants this development to be successful. He stated he <br /> has concerns with the proposed signs but understands that they will be in place on a temporary <br /> basis. <br /> Councilmember Werner supports the two temporary signs. <br /> Councilmember Holden explained that she too wants the project to be successful, but only <br /> supports one sign based on the proposed size. She is frustrated that the signs are being requested <br /> after the Council was told the development would be advertised by other means. <br /> Councilmember McClung does not support the sign along Lexington Avenue. He agrees with <br /> the sign placement along County Road E. He indicated he could support two signs at this location <br /> so long as they do not exceed 216 square feet in size total. <br /> MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a <br /> motion to approve Planning Case 13-005 for a Sign Standard Adjustment at <br /> 1195 County Road E, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as <br /> amended by the four conditions in the May 13, 2013 report to the City <br /> Council. <br /> Councilmember McClung requested an amendment reducing the approved signage to up to two <br /> signs not to exceed 216 square feet total. <br /> Councilmember Holden and Councilmember Holmes accepted this friendly amendment. <br /> Mayor Grant stated that he does not support the adjustment as he wants to be assured the signs <br /> are readable from both Lexington Avenue and County Road E. It is his opinion the signs have to <br /> be readable in order to be an effective marketing tool. <br /> AMENDMENT: Councilmember McClung moved and Councilmember Holden <br /> seconded a motion to amend the request reducing the approved <br /> signage to up to two signs not to exceed 216 feet total. The amendment <br /> failed (2-3) (Holmes, Werner, and Mayor Grant opposed). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.