Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 8, 2013 10 <br /> <br />Commercial Façade Transparency <br /> <br />Community Development Intern Matthew Bachler indicated Section F of the B-2 District design <br />standards includes specifications on the configuration and transparency of windows and doors for <br />commercial properties. The section does not address window transparency for multi-family <br />residential uses, which are allowed in the B-2 District within a Planned Unit Development. <br />Additionally, specific guidelines on the arrangement of windows on a building and the permitted <br />materials for windows and doors are not included. <br /> <br />Staff has revised Section F to include transparency requirements for residential facades. These <br />specifications are intended to keep with the established design principals while also recognizing that <br />commercial façade transparency requirements are not necessarilyappropriate for residential <br />buildings. Guidelines on how windows and doors should be arranged along a building wall are <br />included in the draft revisions. These specifications are meant to ensure consistency between the <br />overall design of the building façade and the placement of window and door openings. The list of <br />acceptable materials for windows and doors is based on industry standards and complements the <br />permitted building wall materials for the district. <br /> <br />Further Points of Discussion <br /> <br />Community Development Intern Matthew Bachler stated the drafts that Staff are currently working <br />on represent initial recommended revisions to the B-2 District design standards. Staff is hoping to <br />start an on-going discussion with the Planning Commission about the existing design standards and <br />areas within the standards that could be improved. Additional points of discussion might include the <br />following: <br /> <br /> <br />Do the draft bicycle parking space requirements accurately reflect the demand for bicycle <br />parking facilities in Arden Hills? <br /> <br />Are the new materials added to the acceptable building materials list enduring, timeless, and <br />well-detailed? Are there additional types of materials that should be added to the list? <br /> <br />concerns regarding the quality of building materials? <br /> <br />Are the residential façade transparency requirements appropriate? <br /> <br />What additional sections of the B-2 District design standards need to be revised? Staff has <br />identified the provisions on parking and franchise architecture as areas that should be studied <br />further. <br /> <br />Community Development Intern Matthew Bachler requested the Planning Commission review the <br />initial recommendations for amendments to the B-2 District Design Standards and provide further <br />direction to staff. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Thompson opened the floor to Commissioner comments. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zimmerman questioned if Chair Larson had provided comment on these points of <br />discussion. <br /> <br /> Community Development Intern Matthew Bachler stated staff planned to have a discussion with <br />Chair Larson to gain additional feedback. <br /> <br />