06-10-13-R - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Arden Hills City Council, June 6, 2013, Pg. 2 The first public open house remains scheduled for September 2013. With two public open houses approved in the scope of work, we looked for the best points in the process at which we can provide useful and informative facts about the site to the public, and to solicit feedback from the public that will be meaningful for them and the project. These two points, and the case for each, are described below. Open House #1-September 2013 We want the firstopen house to be well-attended, to build momentum and excitement for the project, and to let people know they have a voice in the project. To do this, we don’t feel we can show people the same things that have been shown before; nor can we bring a blank slate. As a team we need a period of discoveryto establish the parameters under which the site must be developed. For example, traffic, with two access points instead of three as previously planned, will play a defining role in dictating how much development can occur on the site. We do not want to be disingenuous with the public by asking an open-ended question too early –“what do you want to see on the site?” –when in fact, there are limiting factorsto what can be done.Instead, we would like to share information with them about the capacity of the site, and about the Master Planning process and what it entails, so they can provide focused input that makes a difference in determining specific development scenarios that will be developed. We will nothave a draft Master Plan at this September meeting. Plans will be drafted based on input received.We have refined the purposecolumn on page7of the PIP to clarify this approach. Open House #2 –early 2014 At the second open house, draft Master Planning scenarios will be presented to the public for input, and the next steps for implementation will be provided. The timing of this meeting allows for changes to be made based on this input, before the plan is finalized and approved by the CityCouncil.Again, we have refined the purposecolumn on page7of the PIP to clarify this approach. Clarification of Stakeholders To respond to additional JDA comments, we have also added specific references to the City of Arden Hills and Ramsey County throughout the PIP document (instead of just city and county) for clarification. Conclusion At Kimley-Horn we very much value transparency and integrity in a public process, for all stakeholders. We know from experience that public input can make a valuable difference in the final product, and that in a project like this, public understanding and support is very important. We value the comments of the City Council and JDA, as you know your communities best. We look forward to working with you to make this a successful publicinvolvement process.