My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-15-13-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
07-15-13-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2013 12:53:28 PM
Creation date
8/27/2013 12:53:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—JULY 15, 2013 3 <br /> Councilmember Holden stated that dynamic display has not been allowed in the past and the <br /> City was successful in a previous signage lawsuit. She indicated that she is open, but cautious <br /> about possible changes to the City sign ordinance. <br /> Councilmember Holmes was open to amending the sign code to allow dynamic display signs to <br /> an extent. She thought it only fair to consider the sign application given the fact a similar sign <br /> was already approved for Holiday. <br /> Mayor Grant stated that one thing to consider with gas station price signs is that the sign may <br /> only change once a day, or every couple of days. He commented that the overall size of the sign <br /> should also be taken into consideration. He reported LED does not cast a great deal of light. He <br /> recommended reviewing the provisions in the City Code regarding lighting to see if updates are <br /> needed to address LED lights. <br /> Councilmember Werner questioned the dimensions of the existing sign. <br /> Community Development Intern Bachler stated that the sign is roughly 75 square feet in size <br /> and is currently non-conforming. <br /> Councilmember McClung did not object to the LED gas station price sign so long as the price is <br /> only changed once a day. He recommended that all future LED sign requests be reviewed on a <br /> case by case basis. <br /> The Council supported reviewing the sign request further, but their consensus is that the sign code <br /> should not be amended at this time. <br /> C. Franchise Fees <br /> City Administrator Klaers stated that per Council direction, earlier this year he discussed <br /> franchise fees with neighboring City Managers and learned that Mounds View and New Brighton <br /> have existing franchise fee programs and that Shoreview has just approved a franchise fee. Staff <br /> has also done some preliminary research with Ramsey County on the City's tax base composition. <br /> He has also spoken with Colette Jurek with Xcel Energy to discuss the City's interest in <br /> evaluating a franchise fee program. <br /> City Administrator Klaers commented that the Council discussed the possibility of establishing <br /> a franchise fee program during the June 17, 2013, work session. The additional revenue would <br /> assist the City's in reaching its CIP goals and to address the City's street and trail infrastructure <br /> maintenance issues. Benefits of a franchise fee were further reviewed, noting an electric franchise <br /> fee would generate more income than a gas franchise fee. <br /> City Administrator Klaers reviewed the estimated revenues that would be generated noting <br /> properties within the City would be charged a flat fee. He requested that the Council discuss the <br /> matter further and provide staff with feedback. <br /> Colette Jurek, Xcel Energy, introduced herself to the Council, and stated that she would be the <br /> City's primary point of contact for any and all Xcel Energy issues. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.