My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-15-13-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
07-15-13-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2013 12:53:28 PM
Creation date
8/27/2013 12:53:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—JULY 15, 2013 4 <br /> Ms. Jurek reviewed the proposed flat rate further with the Council and discussed the history of <br /> franchise fees. She commented that the flat rate allowed residents to better budget for their <br /> heating and electrical bills. She explained that the flat rate would be charged once per meter on a <br /> premise. <br /> Councilmember Holden expressed concern that all properties would be charged a flat fee by <br /> classification and that the revenues generated would not be based on user consumption. <br /> Discussion ensued regarding how apartment complexes, Presbyterian Homes, and Bethel <br /> University would be charged franchise fees. <br /> Ms. Jurek explained that if a franchise fee were pursued, a bilateral agreement would be signed <br /> between the City and Xcel after all terms were agreed upon by both parties. She commented that <br /> the fee would have to be fair and balanced and not be burdensome to any user within the City. <br /> Councilmember McClung stated that originally he was supportive of the franchise fee, but after <br /> reviewing the information further, he has concerns with the regressiveness of the plan. He did not <br /> feel it was fair that a flat rate was being charged to all homeowners. He wanted to see the rate <br /> vary by use or by home value. <br /> Councilmember Holden asked if residents on energy assistance would be charged the fee. <br /> Ms. Jurek stated that this was the case. <br /> Councilmember Holmes questioned if two residential franchise fee rates could be established for <br /> large users and small users. <br /> Ms. Jurek stated that this would not be possible. <br /> Councilmember Holden supported the flat rate due to the fact the proposed park improvements <br /> would benefit each residential property regardless of their value in the same manner. She <br /> commented that homes with higher property values were already charged higher property taxes. <br /> Mayor Grant discussed the proposed flat rate and how this would affect Arden Hills' residents. <br /> He questioned if commercial properties could be charged a higher flat rate than residential <br /> properties. <br /> Ms. Jurek stated that there is a little bit of flexibility in this area. She questioned what level of <br /> funding the City was hoping to generate. She reported it would take Xcel approximately 60 days <br /> to set up the franchise fee on the Arden Hills bills. <br /> Mayor Grant estimated that the City might want to generate approximately$600,000. <br /> Councilmember Holden was in favor of increasing the rate to 2.9% which would raise <br /> approximately$650,000. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.