Laserfiche WebLink
th�s feas�bili�y study, City s#aff is recammending tt�►►at the traii be installed on the west side of t�ld <br />Snelling A��nue. City staffis als� proposin� �o inflate I3olt�an & Menk's 2(3i18 cost esiirnate ta <br />$3SC�,(i4fl to represent 24312 �onstruction doilars. <br />In lieu of cQnstr�acting an 8 foot wide trail alon� with �e Qid Sneiling �-Lvenue project, the City <br />eauld a�Iaw pedestrians ta use one of t�ae existing raadway shaulders as a trai�. �or safety <br />purpase�, it is not recammended thai a shoulder be signed and �a.rked as a tr�il, bu1: � shauider is <br />�n opti�ara fo� pedestrian tr�.ffic i� th� �ity is unsure about constructing an S foot wide trail along <br />wit� the Old Snelling Aven�xe project. <br />Cou�tv �.�ad E Brid�e Regl�cemeni; <br />It is a.r�ticip�.ted that 1�� Cc�unty Raaci � bridge crassing over Trun�C I�I�ghw�.y 51 wil� �e <br />rec�nstri.��ted ir� 2415 and that traffic will not l�e able to cross over ar �.ccess TH 51 in this a�`�a <br />durin� the canstructian duraf.ian. This Glosure by MnDOT may direct additianal traffic anta Old <br />Snelling A�enue while the County Raad E brid�;e is reconstru�ted. Since the �ld Snelling <br />Av�nue �iridge struciure �urrently has a posted weight limit, th� City Cau�c�l rnay want to <br />schedule im�ro�eanents to the bridge structure pri�r t� ihe County Rt�ad E}�ridge reconstruciion. <br />R�sey Cauniy will be rec�nstruc;ting U� 1 il and Hwy 9� in 2413, and it is nQt recoBnrrsended <br />th�t these project� occeir sizrh.ultaneously due ta the clasure af Hwy 96 and rerouting af traffic that <br />is expected �urgng constructir��.. <br />REQ�.FI�tED PERMITS <br />The anticipat�d permits required far the pr��os�d praject ar� as fallaws: <br />Minncsc�ia Yffllutian Cantr�l Age�ey (MPCA) ...............................NPI�ES Erosian &�tarmwater <br />R�.msey County ................................................................................................ Right-af way Permit <br />Rice Creek Watershed Dis#xict (RCWI]) ....................................................................... Stormwater <br />Since the propased imprc��ements cflnsisi af bituminvus reclamationlrehahilit�.tian project, <br />�ersus a complet� street reec�nstruction, the City should not ha�ve i:4 construc[ storrn �water qualiiy <br />and �oliune �ontrr�l facilities ta satisfy the Rice Creek Watershed District's �CWD} rules. The <br />ir�prouemen�s t�at are prc�p�sed w��l not result in an ir�crease in ia�riper�i+ous swrface; hower°er, <br />si;aff will worl� wiih RCWD tc� ensure that the prop�sed i�prt��emen�s i'all within their rule�. <br />lluring final d�sign for the praject, City staff will coordinate with the F.ice Creek Waiershed <br />District to ensure any nece��ary pez-�nit requirernea�ts are rnet. <br />NECESSA�Y ANDr C(l�T EFFECTIVI�ESS <br />This projeef is necessary, �ost-effecti�e, �n�i feasib�e fro�n an engineerin� sta�dpoint. Ii is <br />rccQmmcnded that the r�aadw�y impro�ements b� canstructed at the same tirne as reconstruction <br />of the karid�e structure to mini�nize traf�"ic impacts. <br />:� <br />