My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-09-13-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
12-09-13-R
>
12-09-13-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/9/2013 8:31:46 AM
Creation date
12/9/2013 8:30:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
307
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />DATE: December 5, 2013 <br /> <br />TO: Sue Iverson, Director of Finance and Administrative Services <br />Patrick Klaers, City Administrator <br />Amy Dietl, City Clerk <br /> <br />FROM: Jill Hutmacher, Community Development Director <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Dangerous Dog and Potentially Dangerous Dog Fees <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />The City of Arden Hills currently has a dangerous dog fee of $63. The staff and legal costs <br />related to dangerous and potentially dangerous dog designations and appeals often greatly exceed <br />the current fee. Martin Norder, Kelly and Lemmons, has advised the City that it may want to <br />increase the dangerous dog fee to reflect true costs. Following are fees charged by nearby <br />municipalities: <br /> <br />Little Canada $500 <br />Shoreview $250 <br />Vadnais Heights $250 <br />White Bear Township $250/$150 for potentially dangerous <br />Roseville $50 ($100 for subsequent violations) <br />Blaine $500 <br />Minneapolis $500 <br />St. Paul $500 <br /> <br />Martin Norder has suggested that the City could reasonably increase the dangerous dog fee to <br />$500 and initiate a potentially dangerous dog fee of $250. Mr. Norder has considered options for <br />the recovery of appeal costs. He does not feel, however, that there is a method which would <br />survive a challenge, and the collection of appeal costs would likely involve small claims court, <br />thereby incurring additional legal expenses. <br /> <br />Staff recommends that the dangerous dog fee be increased to $500, and a potentially dangerous <br />dog fee of $250 be added to the fee schedule. <br /> <br />11 <br />Page of <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.