My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-8-14-PC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2010-2019
>
PC Packets 2014
>
01-8-14-PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2015 3:33:33 PM
Creation date
1/8/2014 12:18:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION –December 4, 20137 <br />7.The proposal is not expected to exceed noise limits set by the Minnesota Pollution <br />Control Agency. <br />8.The proposal will not adversely impact the surrounding neighborhood or the City as a <br />whole. <br />Community Development Intern Bachler <br />stated based on the submitted plans and findings of <br />fact, staff recommends approval of Planning Case 13-021 for a Planned Unit Development <br />Amendment and Site Plan Review at 4100 HamlineAvenue North. Staff recommends the <br />following five (5) conditions to be included with the approval: <br />1.The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the <br />conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City <br />Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City <br />Council. <br />2.A PUD Amendment drafted by the City Attorney shall be executed prior to the issuance <br />of a building permit. <br />3.The applicant shall acquire a Grading and Erosion Control Permit prior to commencing <br />land disturbing activities on the site. <br />4.The Master PUD Amendment andSite Plan Review shall automatically expire and <br />become void one (1) year after the date on which the Council granted such approval if <br />work on the project has not begun. <br />5.If noise from Building 14 exceeds MPCA noise regulations for residential areas atthe <br />property line, the applicant shall reduce noise levels in order to be in compliance with <br />MPCA regulations. If the City receives complaints regarding noise levels, the applicant <br />shall be responsible for providing decibel measurements from the property line and <br />reducing noise levels to be in compliance with MPCA regulations. <br />Community Development Intern Bachler <br />reviewed the options available to the Planning <br />Commission on this matter: <br />1.Recommend Approval with Conditions. <br />2.Recommend Approval as Submitted. <br />3.Recommend Denial. <br />4.Table. <br />Acting Chair Thompson <br />opened the floor to Commissioner comments. <br />Commissioner Zimmerman <br />questioned whythe additionaltwoparking spaces were needed. <br />Community Development Intern Bachler <br />explained that based on the proposed useof the <br />addition as “Other Business and Industry,” one parking space for each 1,000 square feet of floor <br />area is required. <br />Acting Chair Thompson <br />opened the public hearing at 7:01p.m. <br />Acting Chair Thompson <br />invited anyone for or against the applicationto come forward and <br />make comment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.