02-10-14-R - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

7. The PUD process allows for flexibility within process with a developer. 8. The approximately two acre eastern portion of the subject property proposed for development under the PUD amendment would be primarily accessed from County Road E using the existing east access. 9. In their consideration of the proposed Master PUD at 1201 County Road E in Planning Case 12- dated November 28, 2012. The study evaluated two concept site plans for the two-acre eastern portion of the property: one option included a single 5,625 square foot restaurant generating 715 daily trips, and the second option included a single 9,000 square foot retail building generating 384 daily trips. Both of these previously proposed options are less intense uses in terms of building size and traffic generation as compared to the 17,743 square foot retail building proposed in Planning Case 13-017, which was expected to generate 1,016 daily trips. 10. The high volume of traffic, entry and exit restrictions, circulation pattern and turning movements associated with the proposed use of the eastern access raise safety concerns given the residential apartment use of the existing structure and traffic on County Road E. 11. The intensity of the use proposed is excessive in light of the residential use currently on the property, and could be exacerbated by future use(s) of the proposed structure. D ECISION Based upon these findings the proposed PUD Amendment as detailed in the record for the Property located at 1201 County Road E is hereby denied. th ADOPTED by the Arden Hills City Council this 10 day of February, 2014. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS BY: ______________________________ David Grant, Its Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Patrick Klaers, Its City Administrator