Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 13, 20148 <br /> <br />2. The lot is 17,860 square feet in size. <br />3. The existing garage is a non-conforming structure within the R-2 Zoning District. <br />4. The existing garage encroaches approximately thirty-eight (38) feet and nine (9) inches <br />into the forty (40) foot front yard setback along Lake Johanna Boulevard. <br />5. The footprint of the existing structure and the proposed garage is approximately 484 <br />square feet. The overall footprint does not change with the proposed construction. <br />6. The proposed addition of an overhang along the northern façade of the structure would not <br />encroach any further into the front yard setback along Lake Johanna Boulevard than the <br />existing structure. <br />7. The Zoning Code permits detached accessory garages on lakeshore lots as long as they <br />meet the minimum front yard setback. <br />8. The proposed overhang adds an additional 72 square feet to the area of the roof. <br />9. The existing and proposed lot coverage meets the requirements of the R-2 Single & Two <br />Family Residential Zoning District. <br />10. The height of the structure would remain the same as the existing structure. <br />11. Detached garages or accessory structures are permitted structures within the R-2 Single & <br />Two Family Residential Zoning District. <br />12. Non-conforming structures may be continued through repair, replacement, restoration, <br />maintenance, or improvement. <br /> <br />Variance Findings: <br /> <br />1. The proposal is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the ordinance because the <br />ordinance generally allows flexibility for unique parcels when impacts to surrounding <br />properties are minimized. <br />2. The proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan because it allows the reasonable <br />use of residential property. <br />3. Accessory buildings are generally permitted and are reasonable uses within the R-2 Single <br />& Two Family Residential Zoning District. <br />4. The lot is comparably unique in the City. The property is situated on a lot that slopes <br />significantly from west to east approximately 29 feet, therefore creating a lot where the <br />placement of an attached or detached garage within the setback requirements is <br />exceptionally difficult. <br />5. Since the proposed addition would not encroach any further into the front yard setbacks <br />than the existing structure, the construction of this accessory structure (with overhang <br />addition) is unlikely to have a negative impact on the property or the neighborhood. <br />6. The addition would be visible from neighboring properties; however, the proposed design <br />and the use of high quality materials for the detached structure should minimize the <br />impacts on surrounding property owners. <br />7. The proposed plans and requested variances for the accessory structure do not appear to be <br />based on economic considerations alone. <br /> <br />City Planner Streff <br /> explained that the findings of fact for this variance request support a <br />recommendation for approval. However, if the City Council chooses to deny this variance, the <br />findings of fact would need to be amended to reflect the reasons for the denial. He reported that <br />the Planning Commission reviewed Planning Case #13-020 and unanimously recommends <br />approval (6-0) of the variance request for the property located at 3324 Lake Johanna Boulevard, <br />