Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION –JUNE 19, 201310 <br />northern and southern facades, and 23 percent transparent window coverage for the eastern <br />building façade. None of the proposed window coverage would be tinted, reflective, or frosted. <br />The developer has indicated that depending on the needs of the tenants located in the northern, <br />central, and southern bays of the building, a certain percentage of the window coverage on the <br />eastern, northern, and southern sides of the building may need to be non-transparent. The <br />Planning Commission should determine how much non-transparent window coverage would be <br />permitted on these three sides of the building and include this requirement as a condition of <br />approval. <br />Site Furnishing and Seating Areas –Meets Requirements <br />Benches and decorative plantings are required near the primary entrance of all buildings. <br />Restaurants must provide for an outdoor seating area. The applicant has proposed a large public <br />sidewalk area, measuring from 15 to 20 feet in width, which would wrap around the western and <br />southern sides of the building. Included in this space would be benches, decorative plantings, <br />bicycle parking stands, and outdoor seating for the two restaurant tenants. <br />Screening –Flexibility Requested <br />The City Code requires that trash equipment and containers be fully enclosed and integrated into <br />the architecture of the building. The applicant was unable to accommodate the building’s trash <br />facilities in the interior of the building and has proposed to locate an exterior trash enclosure in <br />the northeast corner of the site. This facility would be fully enclosed and would be constructed <br />with brick and rough cast stone to match the exterior materials used for the principal building. A <br />proposed retaining wall along the northern and eastern sides of the northeastern corner of the <br />property would completely screen the structure from vehicles and pedestrians. Staff is generally <br />favorable to this approach. By removing the trash facilities from the interior of the building, the <br />developer will have more leeway in ensuring that the eastern side of the building facing <br />Lexington Avenue is well designed and aesthetically appealing. <br />Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation –Meets Requirements <br />Sites must be designed to accommodate the safe mobility of pedestrians and bicyclists. The <br />applicant has proposed a pedestrian mobility plan that provides sidewalks linking the entrances <br />of the building to the public sidewalk network and which includes striping where pedestrians <br />must cross parking areas. A total of four bicycle stands are located near the building entrances. <br />The four stands should be able to accommodate up to eight bicycles. <br />3. Traffic Study <br />A traffic study was completed by the SRF Consulting Group for the Lexington Station project. <br />The main objectives of the study were to review existing operations within the study area, <br />evaluate the traffic impacts to the adjacent roadway network, and to recommend any necessary <br />improvements to accommodate the proposed development. The study evaluated all three phases <br />of the development to help illustrate the timeframe in which improvements may be necessary. <br />To evaluate the existing traffic operations, SRF gathered data for the intersections at I-694 and <br />Lexington Avenue; Red Fox Road and Lexington Avenue; Target Service Road and Lexington <br />Avenue; and Grey Fox Road and Lexington Avenue. Based on an analysis of current conditions, <br />it was determined that all intersections are operating at an acceptable Level of Service (LOS) C <br />or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. <br /> <br />